Yeah that's not really derailing, that's just lying flat.
The Washington DC isn't done with trying to turn WestPac into a sea of destruction:
My guess is that Washington DC wants English Vegetable to purge the ROC military of any remaining pro-KMT and pro-unification elements, therefore fully transforming Taiwan into another Ukraine in the WestPac.
Therefore, I think Beijing should really kickstart preparation for a total war against the US-led NATO-plus/+ (here, 'plus/+' means US "allies" that are outside of NATO) - Enter into semi-wartime economy, increase military budget and personnel recruitment, expanding equipment and platform procurement, intensifying improvement and upgrade efforts, heighten military R&D efforts across the board, prepping the populace for worst-case scenarios during wartime, etc.
In the meantime, however, Beijing should also try to keep the conflict delayed for as long as possible.
LOL, he keeps digging a deeper hole for himself. The baby formula incident was a criminal act. If you deliberately adulterate your product with a potential toxin you are breaking the law and you get punished - the legal system doesn't need public backlash to operate. Isn't their criticism of China that it's supposedly an authoritarian police state?You can see him grasping at straws to come up with an excuse lmao. I like how people who claim they are ‘free thinkers’ who criticizes the faults of the West never ever, EVER criticize them at all. Just look at this comment.
His logic is that China wouldn’t punish them if there wasn’t public backlash, therefore the response on the disaster in the US is justified. Lol!
That Island in SCS in urgent need of militarization now. This clown Marcos has gone too far. Wise decisions to hold back on the investments in PH by China so far despite the overtures by Duterte. When the population is dumb and toxic, no matter who holds the office, he has to dance to their tunes, this doesn't mean Marcos had any affinity to improve PH-CN relations in the first place. Show them their third world place by imposing restrictions on visas of their maids and nurses and banning their stupid bananas for health & safety reasons while militarizing that Island. Enough with the niceties. Maybe even tell the coast guard to start ramming their fishing boats or whatever, puny little bunch of islands wanna play tough with a superpower? So be it.
It's a good sign for a country, especially one as large as China, when your critics have to go back to an incident that happened 15 years ago to find something bad they can point to for their whataboutery.
"Rules based order":
The origin of the rules-based rubric can be seen in US strategic documents. Neither of President Clinton’s 1994 or President Bush’s 2000 National Security Strategies made reference to a rules-based order. Barack Obama’s 2010 Strategy only mentioned rules-based once although its is notable that he advocated the US “must now build the sources of American strength and influence, and shape an international order [italics added] capable of overcoming the challenges of the 21st century
By his next National Security Strategy in 2015 President Obama’s emphasis had shifted. While there are only five direct references to a rules-based international order much of the substantive argument is closely related. The 2015 Obama Strategy notes the US has an obligation “to lead the way in reinforcing, shaping, and where appropriate, creating the rules, norms, and institutions [italics added]” and to “uphold and refresh the international rules and norms”. For Obama the rules are American rules for American objectives enforced by America.
The shift from international law to a rules-based order framework in public diplomacy and strategic policy is a rational one on America’s part. The sovereign equality of states is a key principle underlying international law, denying America’s exceptionalism and hegemony. In theory, international law is politically neutral, and formally neutral among regime types, including between autocracies and democracies. The equality and neutrality aspects, disturbingly for US policy makers, allows for the possibility for non-democratic states influencing international law making.
Finally, international law is only applicable to those states who formally agree to be subject to it; this is the consensus principle. Ideally, international law is the antithesis of, and superior to, power politics in international relations. The reality is different.
Restricting its foreign policy activities within the norms and processes of international law doesn’t sit well with the struggling hegemon, and American administrations have had to invent the imaginary but vague regime of a “rules-based global order”.
Unlike the Cold War era international law is no longer a fruitful arena for America. As power shifts occur and non-western states seek to claim the neutrality and sovereignty international law offers, the US has had to cloak its activities under a new disguise.
Or they could've been genuine. Russia plays both sides. In fact, they far prefer their European brethren to the asiatic hordes. If not for NATO's missteps, Russia wouldn't have turned to China. Even now you'll find Russian commentators complaining how China isn't doing enough to supply them and confront the US, while Russians are selflessly shedding blood directly fighting the hegemon. It's rather similar to how Ukraine (and to an extent all proxy states) beg and at the same time secretly resent the US. It's in Russia's natural interests to stir up trouble between east and west so that China is weakened and has no choice but to turn to Russia.Most of the call is amateurish but there is one nugget. Around 6 minutes he's talking about his conversations with Shoigu when he was in power. He says he spoke a little about Syria and Libya but of his conversations with him was about China....
It goes along with what we've been hearing from other leaks, like the German admiral who thought NATO should partner with Russia against China because they were both "Christian".
I'm convinced the Russians were employing maskirovka since 2014. They were telling the Americans what they wanted to hear about China and completely blindsided them when they launched the war.