Man! I bet you were not growing up in China like me. My basic stance is that, if I could do it, then other Chinese can do it also. And it is only fair that all Chinese inside China can have the same opportunity for their own lives. Isn't that we have been trying all along in "团结起来，振兴中华"? I doubt you even know that thing.
I don't know what you're talking about; it sounds like you want to regulate China's internet into something like what the GFW does but without it. Makes no sense to me. In layman terms, how do you want the average Chinese internet user's experience changed?
Irrelevent to the issue.
This is idealistic and wrong. People are naturally of varying competency and mental/genetic build. If you were an average person and you could just about do it, then it means that the half the population will fail. On other things, you may fail where others succeed. I've never assumed that others can do what I can do or vice versa.
What does this sentence mean? What oppertunity? It's like a drug dealer saying that some people can naturally resist the need to do drugs so you should let your kids try some and have the oppertunity to decide for their own lives.
No, we're trying to unify the people so using our combined strength, we push Chinese power to the top of the world. If you think that anything's more important than that, then you certainly don't know a thing.
You vastly under-estimate the bureaucratic inertia and the entrenched interests. Say I am a US citizen living outside China for the past N decades, right? Do you know what led to Shanghai breakdown of Covid prevention？ Bureaucracies and entrenched local interests!!! If your theory sticks, Shanghai would have done at least as well as Shenzhen scare. But it is not.
My theory has nothing to do with COVID. Others say that it was learning from Western policies that led to the disaster in Shanghai. Your entire paragraph here reads like a crumbling green bean snack.
Neither would I but I simply answer the points.
No, you have failed to answer my points which are founded on logical reasoning and common sense. They are good enough to bring to any debate. Only one who fears them tries to disqualify others based on his own claimed credentials rather than answering the points. I will not allow you to run rampant trash-talking the most successful government in the world unopposed simply because no one with governing credentials or ICT specialty is here. You don't set the rules for qualification on this forum.
That's your opinion, which you have failed to support, against the analysis of the CCP and other members here.
I seriously doubt you or others here you referenced have any qualification to question me on that regard
You have no idea dude. I cannot say more on this subject. But I am having a hunch that you are either 1450type or something else. I seriously doubt you are among those red-blooded Chinese.
I seriously doubt you or others here you referenced have any qualification to question me on that regard
I don't question qualifications because I'm a competent debater; rather, anyone speaking with logic has the proper qualifications to question others. I go for your points and rebut them with logic like you're supposed to do in a debate. Only people who cannot win with logic start hiding behind personal questions trying to disqualify others from even talking and self-purported "qualifications" to make it look like he must speak unopposedI seriously doubt you or others here you referenced have any qualification to question me on that regard
. Don't try to shut others up; answer questions and debate with logic. Where's the confidence? Yeah, I have no idea what you're trying to say. I just asked you twice:
OK, it does seem we're at your limit. The first paragraph of your last post was when you first sounded like a verbal drunk falling down the stairs.
Wow, I cannot directly tell if you are right or wrong when you talk about ICT specifications as I'm not in the field but from the way you speak, you sounded like a person who's wrong all the time while calling other people stupid. And now, you've actually proven it to me by saying that I'm not a red-blooded Chinese person. 1450? Me? I'm pro-CCP saying that they've earned the benefit of the doubt every time and you're calling them foolish... and I'm a 1450?? Not you?? LOLOL It's like Danny Devito calling Shaq a midget online...
Because he mentioned things related "CCP" "members" etc. I don't think he has any clue when he did that here in a foreign forum. Not all CCP members really understand CCP nowadays, let alone foreigners