Miscellaneous News

enroger

Junior Member
Registered Member
Of course they exaggerated the foreign interference angle. That's not even the worst of the mistakes that Imran Khan made in his tenure. Allying with people like Tareen/Aleem/Buzdar were much bigger mistakes.

But the fact is this: For all the mistakes that PTI made, your only alternative right now is the fuckin PDM. If crooks like Nawaz/Zardari/Diesel return in power, they will reverse Pakistan's development by a decade.

The idea that the only people supporting PTI right now are 'cult' followers is ridiculous. The majority of his support are people who simply hate the alternative. IK and PTI is far from perfect, but at least the direction and intention is correct. The PDM don't even pretend to have the right direction. Their whole platform is literally based on open looting and patronage.

Don't know anything about Pakistani politics, can you give a rough picture? What is the demographics supporting PTI/PDM respectively? Middle income folks/lower income folks, higher education/lower education, younger/older...etc? What do you think id IK's chance in the next election (is there an emergency election or was it ruled out by SC)?
 

Coalescence

Senior Member
Registered Member
View attachment 86772

Customary "my wife is Chinese, therefore I am correct" as usual

At this point I'm starting to think all these my wife's family is from China posts are CIA or bot-generated
If what they say is remotely true, then the entire Shanghai should be revolting against the CPC now. Its possible that in some parts of Shanghai, food are not distributed equally, similar to situation back then in Xi'an where the richer district is given food while the others didn't.

The problem should be corrected soon enough, netizens should continue making a scene online to get it change as soon as possible, because they seem to be listening and did change the policy to allow non-infected parents to stay in quarantine with infected children like user KYli have posted in the Coronavirus thread.
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
High-income nations are responsible for 74% of the global excess in resource extraction over the 1970-2017 period, driven primarily by the USA and the countries of the European Union. This is demonstrated in an international study led by Jason Hickel, researcher at ICTA-UAB, which determines national responsibility for ecological breakdown by calculating the extent to which each nation has overshot their fair share of sustainable resource use thresholds.



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Michaelsinodef

Senior Member
Registered Member
High-income nations are responsible for 74% of the global excess in resource extraction over the 1970-2017 period, driven primarily by the USA and the countries of the European Union. This is demonstrated in an international study led by Jason Hickel, researcher at ICTA-UAB, which determines national responsibility for ecological breakdown by calculating the extent to which each nation has overshot their fair share of sustainable resource use thresholds.



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
It kinda ignores per capita especially when it lists China as 2nd (not to mention China produces a lot of things that then gets exported to EU and the US)
 
Top