Miscellaneous News

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
Reminds me of when people say that Shanghai/Shenzhen are the economic engines of China where they only think of money, but Beijing is the soul of the country.

When these elites think too short term or without taking into account the wider strategic environment, Beijing comes in and gets everyone in line with giving a grand vision and ambition for China.


While I resent these liberal idiots, I can rest easy knowing that CPC is firmly in control with competent people who can see much further in the future than them.

I propose sending these liberals for 3 years to comrade Kim to learn what is important in life and what is not.
Better yet, Pres.Xi should implement his own version of "The Hundred Flowers campaign" to ferret out these internal locusts, Qing like corrupt officials, business tycoons that made enormous amount of wealth cavorting with the British empire.
 

Phead128

Captain
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Reminds me of when people say that Shanghai/Shenzhen are the economic engines of China where they only think of money, but Beijing is the soul of the country.

When these elites think too short term or without taking into account the wider strategic environment, Beijing comes in and gets everyone in line with giving a grand vision and ambition for China.


While I resent these liberal idiots, I can rest easy knowing that CPC is firmly in control with competent people who can see much further in the future than them.

I propose sending these liberals for 3 years to comrade Kim to learn what is important in life and what is not.
I agree China denouncing Russian invasion publicly is useless because nobody in West cares or will forget in five seconds, China is still bad in their eyes, and is the foremost enemy. It only serves a useless narrative of moral superiority which only West cares about.

However, among Chinese geopolticians, the reason I say Russia is an imperialist is because I do not want to see a China-Russia formal treaty alliance or mutual defense pact, because it would drag China into nuclear WW3. You are not married and should not be married, just only dating with consensual sex (with protection), but never marry.
 
Last edited:

GodRektsNoobs

Junior Member
Registered Member
Even a broken clock is right twice a day (so someone who does good analysis and the likes can sometimes be wrong as well), while he predicted that Russia wouldn't invade (he gave some reasons and his thoughts) ultimately it's all from his opinion/view (he was also sometimes part of the guancha livestreams in the opening days of the invasion).

Doesn't mean because of that, all his past and future videos and opinions should be thrown into the garbage. Also a lot of his analysis and the likes are done on something that has happened (and he also talks about relevant history), stuff where he tries to predict something is to my knowledge something done more rarely.
He is a professor of political science specializing in US politics. I watch his videos, and his analysis on the US is flawless - far better than most American "analysts." But it seems that his knowledge of Russia is limited.
 

Michaelsinodef

Senior Member
Registered Member
I agree China denouncing Russian invasion publicly is useless because nobody in West cares or will forget in five seconds, China is still bad in their eyes, and is the foremost enemy. It only serves a useless narrative of moral superiority which only West cares about.

However, among Chinese geopolticians, the reason I say Russia is an imperialist is because I do not want to see a China-Russia formal treaty alliance or mutual defense pact, because it would drag China into nuclear WW3. You are not married and should not be married, just only dating with consensual sex (with protection), but never marry.
No need to worry about it, China has come forth many times that it won't sign such treaties and it won't do it with Russia either.
 

KYli

Brigadier
I agree China denouncing Russian invasion publicly is useless because nobody in West cares or will forget in five seconds, China is still bad in their eyes, and is the foremost enemy. It only serves a useless narrative of moral superiority which only West cares about.

However, among Chinese geopolticians, the reason I say Russia is an imperialist is because I do not want to see a China-Russia formal treaty alliance, because it would drag China into nuclear WW3. You are not married and should not be married, just only dating with consensual sex (with protection), but never marry.
If Russia and China wanted to form an alliance, they would have done so many years ago. The reason why they didn't is quite simple. China and Russia allied in containing the NATO and the US from encircling them. However, both countries have different interests. China doesn't have a beef with most European countries and doesn't want to drag into a conflict with any of them in case of Russia and European countries have a fallout. On the other hand, Russia has friends in Asia such as India and Vietnam that don't have a good relationship with China. Therefore, both countries want the flexibility to maneuver so there were not a formal alliance.

However, the containment and new iron curtain are already here. Alliance or no alliance, Russia needs China and China needs Russia.
 

KenC

Junior Member
Registered Member
Nuggets of wisdom from Zhao Lijian to Western reporters:


FP: The US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday repeated President Biden’s assertion that Russian forces are committing war crimes in Ukraine by deliberately targeting civilians. You just spoke about China’s awareness of the scale of damage and civilian casualties in Ukraine. But I’d like to ask whether China has any concerns at all that these civilian casualties have been caused by Russian forces? If it’s possible, could we avoid talking about previous US actions that may have caused civilian casualties in previous conflicts?

Zhao Lijian: I have answered many questions about civilians in recent days. Of course China is saddened by civilian casualties.  There is no point in badgering us on this question.

I also have a question for you. As a journalist working with a mainstream media and news agency in Europe, you need to think about the following questions. As the culprit of the Ukraine crisis, why does the US keep smearing China instead of reflecting on the security predicament in Europe caused by the eastward expansion of US-led NATO? Why doesn’t the US listen to the observation by Dr. Kissinger and other experts that Ukraine must not be either side’s outpost against the other? Why doesn’t the US reflect on its hypocritical move of watching the fire from across the river after fanning the flames?

I am not sure if it occurred to the Europeans that the US was fully capable of pushing for NATO’s eastward expansion but sent no troops to support the Ukrainian people. Did you forget that the US was among the first to evacuate civilians and diplomatic personnel from Ukraine? Have you ever imagined that the US would never send a single soldier to fight and die for Ukraine? You are associated with a major media outlet from Europe. Did you ever think about why has Europe become a battlefield and a wrestling ground of major-country rivalry? Why has Ukraine become a pawn to be sacrificed in major-country rivalry? Maybe our friends from major European media outlets should also raise these questions to the US. 

The least thing the US should do is to sling mud at China which is not a party directly concerned. The despicable move of the US only serves to reveal its guilty conscience and true intention to shift the blame and profit from the Ukraine crisis. 
 
Top