manqiangrexue
Brigadier
First of all, this is not an example of what you said before; you said a game that people could not tell was Chinese winning them over before they discover that it's Chinese. And I said that they pose no cultural relevence to China. This one you show is unmistakably Chinese from the first scene so it is not a proper example. However, let's roll with it anyway.
How many games and anime has Japan made flush with Japanese culture? Is Japan viewed positively or negatively in China and South Korea?
Why wouldn't someone really love the Chinese food they eat and be tempted to look up where its from and learn the culture? It's the same thing: people will use what they want from their enemies but will not love their enemies for it. Your extremely naivity in your fantastical conflict-less world view is pouring over to cloud your evaluation of the effects of products producing "soft/flaccid/limp" power. I eat Indian food; I drive a Japanese car; when I'm bored out of my mind, I play free American games on the computer maybe once every month or 2; it doesn't mean I like or even hold neutral opinions of any of those nations. I consider them all every bit as evil as if I'd never touched their products once. Americans feel that way about China as well or hatred towards China wouldn't be climbing as it is right now in the US and its puppet states. That's the real normal world that we live in.
Why? Who's going to dislike a game of a monkey beating shit up with his stick?
Almost did what? What time period caused you to misinterpret that as nearly a peaceful reunion? LOL
Like I said, my argument is founded on a plethora of reasons, none of which you can rebut, for why this definition and its founder are wrong. Your argument is only that it exists so it's good enough. The theory for the earth being flat also exists as its founder had first suggested and it was also backed by prominant scientists at the time. It's as correct as the soft power definition that you cling to.
You asked how the ROC can be reunified and I said this way. I clearly meant that as a future scenerio for how. It's obviously not now as evidenced by the fact that it's not currently happening. Basic logic reasoning and English comprehension are required.
Like I said, reading comprehension is needed. I said I cannot think of a country that has a POSITIVE public image in a nemesis nation. And you gave me an example of a country with a NEGATIVE public image in a nation that it does not have rivalries with. Did you fail to understand what I said or are you logically unable to comprehend the difference between what I said and what you did?
Of course the US can have a negative image in any countries that don't lick American boots for survival. Any country capable of common sense seeing the atrocities America commits all over the world and doesn't actively use media propaganda to spin it to their citizens will and should have a negative image regarding the US for the horrible crimes that it factually commits.
Last edited:
