Lmao, so 70% (likely even higher as those 11% probably include more Chinese vendors) of their smartphone market is Chinese companies - "boycott China"Those indians like to troll BOYCOTT China! Jai Hind!!.... on their Xiaomi phones.
Lmao, so 70% (likely even higher as those 11% probably include more Chinese vendors) of their smartphone market is Chinese companies - "boycott China"Those indians like to troll BOYCOTT China! Jai Hind!!.... on their Xiaomi phones.
Did Eric Adams really do this??? Why isn’t the opposition taking advantage?
Yeah, I'm fine with corruption when it brings with it economic development and rising standards of living.
Anglos as a culture and people love to virtue signal, it's in their nature, coming from the puritanical values of history- compared to the more pragmatic continentals eg french ppl don't care if their politicians have mistresses and yet anglos appear to believe their politicians should be virgins.
Of course it's easy to hide behind the environment because the environment can't speak for itself and point out all of the hypocrisy. It's like animal rights activists. The West eats more meat per person and in total tonnage than the rest of the world combined yet they're at the forefront of speaking up for animals criticizing other cultures about how they treat animals. They will say they kill humanely which they say makes the difference. Ask the animal, if they could, does that matter to them? And like I said before, the royals are speaking sternly for the environment to deflect from the scandal of accusations of racism in the royal family. What does Prince William pulling no punches do? So the world now is really going to listen?
And exactly how is Africa in any way similar to Singapore? Just because one system worked well for someone does not mean it's universal. That was the whole point of that discussion. Some corruption was needed to get things done and it was the lesser of the two evils. Just go back and read some of the discussion and you will get what we are trying to say.(I haven't paid much attention to the conversation on corruption. I just want to comment on the above sentence.)
Sorry, I'm not fine with corruption, even when it does not impede economic growth. You seem to believe that corruption is necessary for development; perhaps you're thinking of Taiwan.
But Singapore is a counterexample: it is now one of the richest countries in the world, in spite of doing everything it could to fight the rot while it was developing. And Singapore used to be one of the poorest countries in the world; the British established it to take advantage of the cheap labor (mostly ethnic Chinese).
So corruption is by no means necessary for development, as you appear to think.
(I haven't paid much attention to the conversation on corruption. I just want to comment on the above sentence.)
Sorry, I'm not fine with corruption, even when it does not impede economic growth. You seem to believe that corruption is necessary for development; perhaps you're thinking of Taiwan.
But Singapore is a counterexample: it is now one of the richest countries in the world, in spite of doing everything it could to fight the rot while it was developing. And Singapore used to be one of the poorest countries in the world; the British established it to take advantage of the cheap labor (mostly ethnic Chinese).
So corruption is by no means necessary for development, as you appear to think.