I said "you are making China another version of US." I did not say that the west want that. I don't care what the west want, I only care what China want to be, and to a lesser extent what the rest of the world want China to be.I don't agree. The west does not want chjs to be another version of the US. They are working actively to prevent it. They want a china chats subservient to the west.
P.S. I assume that chjs and chats are just typos?
I did not say that you suggested China to be the "good boy of the west", I meant that what you suggested will lead China to be the "good boy of the west" even if that is against what you want.No that's not my suggestion. I suggest China sometimes fight fire with fire. It would be the opposite of turning china into a vassel state if china can defend herself adequately no the PR world stage.
I think china needs to work smarter in PR and counter better against the Wests lies. And I think better messaging is needed. A lie, however big, if said a million times becomes truth. I feel china needs use some these strategies to counter such attacks.
But the problem is that's only my opinion and Everyone has one.
Put in another way, I was saying that you have fallen to the trap of the west to shape China's future in the form of the west preferred by provocation. Very often people do things opposite to their intentions. That happens when they listen too much, care too much and try heard to beat the enemy in the enemy's game. That is the "fight fire with fire" that you talk about.
I like chairman Mao's phrase "你打你的,我打我的", "you fight your way, I fight mine", that led China on the course of defeating US. On the contrary, USSR went "tit for tat" with US, and collapsed. If China ever want to be the number one, China must destroy the ground work of US about how things are done, how to speak, how to behave. Do not give the world the impression that China is going to play the US game, walk the US way and talk in the US manner, but only the opposite, to get the world used to how things are done in Chinese way.
Last edited: