where was that written in your article?
It wasn't written in the article I posted. I saw the article mention the purchase of Smithfield Foods by a Chinese company where if I recall correctly the company would've went out of business if this Chinese company didn't buy it. Well then maybe these people should've experienced losing their jobs then if they want to complain. Did the purchase of Smithfield Foods by a Chinese company help China's image? According to this article... no. In my experience Chinese more likely think just being around solves these problems. I remember when the TV show Friends was the top show in the US. It was criticized for being all white. Asian-Americans would whine, "Where's the Asian friend on Friends...?" The show was popular because it was about young white people. Today Americans complain about wokeness. That means the sentiment hasn't changed since then yet Asians think imposing themselves will solve this problem. Maybe it's Asian denial or even arrogance, but the world doesn't look positively on Asians. And some maybe in denial of this but Westerners see Asians as ugly, racially and culturally. Asians culturally think doing nothing is what's best and that allowed the West to dictate who Asians are. Asian don't stand out because they think that kind of attention is bad. That gives off the personae of being nothing and therefore weak. Americans don't like being around weak people. They think they're elite and therefore want to be around the best not around worthless nobodies. I'll bring up the ISS again... China thinks it deserves to be on the ISS. Why? Because it can do the basics of space travel like the US. Which means China doesn't do anything unique so why would the ISS need China when someone else can do it just as fine?
Ever hear of the saying, "If you can't beat them, join them." That's how Americans/Westerners operate. They want to be a winner. Asians think just letting them win will make Westerners like them. No, it's the opposite. You have to keep beating them until they realize they're not going to win against you and because they want to be a winner, their only option left is to join up with the winner. I've argued with many people in life and what I've noticed especially when it comes to politics and I run circles around people, all of the sudden they start sympathizing. Do I believe they actually understand what I was arguing? Maybe... maybe not. Like I said, they just want to be on the side of a winner. Winning only matters. Yes it's superficial if they don't understand the argument but it's just as superficial as Asians thinking having an Asian friend on the TV show Friends will make Americans accept and like them.
Problem i see with allowing such hate mongering and hate speech to go unanswered is that it will and it has resulted in pogroms and hate attacks against Chinese and other Asians; racists aren't going to differentiate between who's who in the zoo when they're attacking someone.
What i would like to see is the equivalent of Israel's government and non government organisations that pressure foreign governments against hate attacks against Chinese, lobby and pressure governments to lay down the harshest punishments for attacks against Chinese and Asians and failing that, a Task Force Talon style SpecOps team to extradite and bring to justice, the likes of Cotton, Pompeo et al.
It is impossible to stamp out all hate by being nice bending over backward to show how Chinese aren't a threat, so don't bother. You have to make countries believe they will lose going against you. China cannot replicate what Israel has done because number one Chinese aren't white. Then Chinese wasted time culturally thinking saying nothing and doing nothing when wronged was the best course of action. All that did was make Chinese look weak.