Miscellaneous News

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General

I thought the US was energy independent. It doesn’t mean they get oil cheap from their own oil companies. Even in wartime emergency situations, the US has to pay market prices so oil companies can exploit and profit. In rich oil states, gas is super cheap. That would never happen in the US where an abundance of oil means gasoline is cheaper than normal. Another example of why everything is more expensive in the West despite how the US claims to have more domestic oil reserves than Saudi Arabia. Someone private has to profit is more important than nation security.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Only the West thinks this is a great deal. China has to pay more instead of getting to pay less. What does China get? They ask for China to do a lot of stuff but you never hear what China is going to get from doing what they want? Maybe they'll like China afterwards... Maybe they think China is not suppose to get anything like how the West expects China not to retaliate after they slap sanctions on China because China is one that's suppose to understand that it's been bad and deserves punishment. The fact is you can't trust the West on anything. They talk about the rule of law but that's what they expect from everyone else while they don't have to follow it. Look at how Trump think he gets to choose another country's leader. That's not democracy. Of course because they have to install Western-type institutions that favor their interests over anyone else's even their own people before a country under their control can have a democracy.
The western think tanks and leaderships are bunch of people doing "软饭硬吃".
 

Randomuser

Major
Registered Member
It just hit me: When China doesn't directly step in for Venezuela or Iran, countries where it has no formal defense treaties, the westoids call it 'abandonment' of friends.

But what do you call it when the US effectively abandons the entire GCC for real?

These are countries that actually host US bases and have formal security agreements.

This isn't just a pivot; it's a literal desertion.

They pulled all of the soldiers and huge portions of equipment out of the Gulf to save face and scramble to protect Israel, leaving their long-term partners completely exposed.

The 'security umbrella' didn't just leak; it was folded up and taken away the second things got real.

If you’re a regional ally watching the US strip your defenses to shield a single state, you’re not an 'ally' anymore; you’re just a temporary parking lot for an empire in retreat.

Moreover, it has never been China’s style to go around the globe telling other countries how mighty it is or why they should become its vassals.

China’s strategy has always been focused on a more stable, self-sufficient, higher ROI, internal development, and power building.

When you look at it from that perspective, China is still delivering on its own superpower philosophy.

In 2025, they hit 5% GDP growth with a massive 9.4% surge in high-tech manufacturing, proving their model works in their own lane.

Meanwhile, the US is failing in its own external imperial model.

In just five days of direct conflict against a regional power, it has already lost billions of dollars' worth of high-value military assets and all face.

Selective framing and people not able to think clearly.

I notice you see all these westoids post pics on how Assad, Maduro, khamanei etc are gone so soon it will be Kim or Putin's turn. Therefore the wet is winning.

How many leaders in the west alliance have gone while Assad was there? Why is that not seen as the west losing? Because they are a democracy so even if one person goes the thing doesn't change? Then doesn't that mean Venezuela hasn't changed since technically they still have the same people in charge except the public head. They are supposed to be democratic. Hell even if Kim or Putin are gone if they have a robust system then the system will just get someone new no different from those democracy in the west. Using this method is flawed from the start since when leaders of the west leave it's not a problem but when it happens to others then it is.

Maybe that's why the US misread Iran. If they have the mentality above then Iran only has one leader and will soon collapse unlike the west which has leaders coming and going. The idea of Iran having replaceable leaders never occured to them even though they literally have elections. Assad is gone because his system was weak rather than him being a singular leader. It's all about the system.
 
Last edited:

dingyibvs

Senior Member

I thought the US was energy independent. It doesn’t mean they get oil cheap from their own oil companies. Even in wartime emergency situations, the US has to pay market prices so oil companies can exploit and profit. In rich oil states, gas is super cheap. That would never happen in the US where an abundance of oil means gasoline is cheaper than normal. Another example of why everything is more expensive in the West despite how the US claims to have more domestic oil reserves than Saudi Arabia. Someone private has to profit is more important than nation security.
The US does not produce enough refined products, specifically gasoline, for its needs.
 

Sardaukar20

Major
Registered Member
Saar! We betrayed Russia and Iran for you. We challenge China for you. Why are you saying this saar?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
“India should understand that we are not going to make the same mistakes that we made with China 20 years ago in terms of saying, ‘Oh, you know, we’re going to let you be able to develop all these markets and then, you know, the next thing we know is you’re beating us in a lot of commercial events,’” Landau said at the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, India’s flagship conference on geopolitics and geoeconomics.
For a snake that betrays everybody, India gets what it deserves. Jai Hind!
 

Rank Amateur

Junior Member
Registered Member
Based Jiang doing calculus on the spot. I wonder how many world leaders could do the same.

Today's lesson in mathematics - I heard she has a degree from MIT the other day?

PRC President: drops in on university calculus class; quotes philosopher's statement from two millennia ago on a whim; casually chalks out complex formula expressing it in mathematical terms => gets it right

Anti-PRC ethnic-Chinese sh*tposter in Singapore: decides to attack PRC's economic figures using mathematical concept learned by average Singaporean at 14-15 years of age; has unfettered online access to all of humanity's mathematical knowledge; has all the time in the world to check and confirm her formula and numbers => gets it wrong
 
Top