Navy operates Growlers.What else can I say but Bruh.
After the air force, now is the navy's turn.
Navy operates Growlers.What else can I say but Bruh.
After the air force, now is the navy's turn.
They'll own your coalmine and put you in it. Don't make retarded jokes like that at me again.Can I take your kids? I need them for my coal mine. I promise I will give them a generous wage, of 50 cents.
Russia and the US have seen that they cannot win unilaterally and will have to make a deal in which both will concede part of their plans.
Russia will get Donbas and Crimea, and the US will gain control of the exploration of rare earths and western positions in Ukraine.
But those who can be called "winners" of the war will be Poland, Italy and Spain, who will take advantage of the weakness of Germany and France to increase their influence and desires in the EU.
For Ukraine, the result will be mixed. The old artificial Ukraine, with its Orthodox majority population and Soviet borders, has been destroyed, it is gone forever!
But a new Ukraine should emerge better than the one that ended in the long run. The dominant part of the male population will be Polish/Ruthenian from the west of the country, will continue to have access to the Black Sea and will have the presence of Poles and Americans exploiting rare earths and agriculture. It will be an extension of Poland politically, economically and ultimately militarily. The Orthodox men who did not die in the war or migrated abroad will be much weaker and this will make the new Ukraine more cohesive socially and politically.
For Russia, the agreement will be good for the economy, but it will not be a complete victory because the existence of a new cohesive Ukraine linked to Poland and the US will be an unneutralized threat.
For China, the result is also mixed. A Russian agreement with the US means that Russia is also open to negotiations with the US and will put its interests first. So on the one hand it will be good for China's economy, but on the other hand it will also have to deal with the reality of Russia being open to negotiations with the US. Therefore the Chinese will also have to negotiate with the Russians for better agreements and security.
For the US, the outcome of the war in Ukraine will be equally mixed. On the one hand, they prevented a complete Russian victory and reasserted their control over Europe, but on the other hand, they saw that they had reached their limit and were also unable to defeat Russia. It was a stalemate in the grand scheme of things.
Ukraine says it will not accept US-Russia peace deal reached without Kyiv
President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Thursday Ukraine would not accept any bilateral agreement on its fate reached by Moscow and Washington without Kyiv's involvement, and called for Europe to have a seat at the table in negotiations to end the war.
The Ukrainian leader made the comments at a nuclear plant on his way to the Munich Security Conference, a day after U.S. President Donald Trump spoke to Russian leader Vladimir Putin Zelenskiy and announced the start of negotiations.
"We, as an independent country, simply will not be able to accept any agreements without us," Zelenskiy told reporters.
The Putin call and remarks by Trump's defence secretary, who said Kyiv cannot join NATO or that a return to Ukraine's pre-2014 borders is unrealistic, have caused alarm in Europe that the White House could seek to make a deal with Russia without them.
"Today it's important that everything does not go according to Putin's plan, in which he wants to do everything to make his negotiations bilateral (with the U.S.)," Zelenskiy said.
He said it was important for the United States and Ukraine to draw up a plan to end the war before talking to the Russian side.
He has been pushing to meet Trump before Trump meets Putin, although the U.S. president said on Wednesday that he was expecting to meet Putin in the future, probably in Saudi Arabia.
Ukraine has said it is working on a Zelenskiy-Trump meeting, but nothing firm has been announced so far.
Zelenskiy said he did not discuss the matter of NATO membership during his phone call with Trump, though he said he knew that the United States was against the idea.
He also tried to play down the significance of
Trump calling Putin before him on Wednesday, saying it did not look like a marker of Washington's real priorities but adding that it was nonetheless "unpleasant".
As the third anniversary of Russia's invasion nears, Moscow controls a fifth of Ukraine and has been slowly advancing in the east for months, while Kyiv's smaller army grapples with manpower shortages and tries to hold a chunk of territory in western Russia.
"We, as an independent country, simply will not be able to accept any agreements without us," Zelenskiy told reporters.
How in the actual fuck does that even happen? Bumper boats with Burkes, whatever. But this I can barely even fathom.
What about @9dashline's offer?They'll own your coalmine and put you in it. Don't make retarded jokes like that at me again.
They should declare war on the US.
Well you can go the same way South Vietnam did. Because Ukraine pushing their own terms on the table means nothing happens.
As a kid I didn’t accept that I needed to do my math homework until the belt came out.
Well you can go the same way South Vietnam did. Because Ukraine pushing their own terms on the table means nothing happens.
Foreign!!!Does Gulf of America count as a foreign or domestic destination?
According to John Sledge, the museum's maritime historian in residence, when the Spanish first reached the Gulf in 1513, they thought they had found a route to Asia and initially called it the Chinese Sea (a name unlikely to appeal to Trump, Sledge noted). Other early explorers called it the Gulf of Cortés or the Gulf of New Spain.
And it failed and ended up making Russia stronger and also made Russia turn towards Asia away from America and the EU in almost every sense of the word making this the greatest geopolitical failure to date for Washington. I don’t think this gesture from Trump is going to make up for all the pain and humiliation that Russia had to go through due to these actions by Washington and I don’t think Putin is stupid enough to trust Trump given that well, Trump did allow for the process of Ukraine to be armed when he could’ve stopped it and well during his first term, he did sanction Russia, so he is basically an untrustworthy piece of shitTrump isn't innocent either. It was under his term that US started arming Ukraine. Ukraine was really a joint effort between last three administrations.
It’s true that Trump made the call and Putin has shown some interest but what makes anyone think that Russia is just going to accept a deal that quick. These talks could take ages and Russia is still going to be fighting for quite a while and Trump would have to be the one to make all the concessions, not Putin. Russia is winning and just one call from Trump isn’t going to change that, the deal would have to be properly ironed out And it will not be to the benefit of the USA. Still the EU are the ultimate losers, I give you thatThe real big losers of the war in Ukraine are the UK, France and Germany.
They lost economically and militarily and thus lost their morale in the European Union. The world order in which these former powers still had relevance is over and now they will have to reinvent themselves or disappear.
Russia and the US have seen that they cannot win unilaterally and will have to make a deal in which both will concede part of their plans. Russia will get Donbas and Crimea, and the US will gain control of the exploration of rare earths and western positions in Ukraine.
But those who can be called "winners" of the war will be Poland, Italy and Spain, who will take advantage of the weakness of Germany and France to increase their influence and desires in the EU.
For Ukraine, the result will be mixed. The old artificial Ukraine, with its Orthodox majority population and Soviet borders, has been destroyed, it is gone forever!
But a new Ukraine should emerge better than the one that ended in the long run. The dominant part of the male population will be Polish/Ruthenian from the west of the country, will continue to have access to the Black Sea and will have the presence of Poles and Americans exploiting rare earths and agriculture. It will be an extension of Poland politically, economically and ultimately militarily. The Orthodox men who did not die in the war or migrated abroad will be much weaker and this will make the new Ukraine more cohesive socially and politically.
For Russia, the agreement will be good for the economy, but it will not be a complete victory because the existence of a new cohesive Ukraine linked to Poland and the US will be an unneutralized threat.
For China, the result is also mixed. A Russian agreement with the US means that Russia is also open to negotiations with the US and will put its interests first. So on the one hand it will be good for China's economy, but on the other hand it will also have to deal with the reality of Russia being open to negotiations with the US. Therefore the Chinese will also have to negotiate with the Russians for better agreements and security.
For the US, the outcome of the war in Ukraine will be equally mixed. On the one hand, they prevented a complete Russian victory and reasserted their control over Europe, but on the other hand, they saw that they had reached their limit and were also unable to defeat Russia. It was a stalemate in the grand scheme of things.
All this just shows that we are in a multipolar world again.
The fierce expansion of US hegemonic power after the collapse of the USSR is over, but they continue to be a superpower.
The US, China and Russia have seen their strengths and their limits and will have to coexist from now on. The balance of interests between the powers will once again be the focus of the world.
Missed it. Not worried. She doesn't like stupid people. She's an econ PhD so when he says, "Mark my words, the USD's going to zero in 6 months," interview over.What about @9dashline's offer?