"McKinsey partners question China presence as US tensions mount"
...
"McKinsey partners have been questioning the consulting giant’s presence in China, worried that doing business there may not be worth the risks, given the Asian superpower’s increasingly volatile relationship with the US.
Some senior partners have been voicing these concerns since late last year, even before Donald Trump was re-elected with a pledge to ratchet up pressure on China, according to people familiar with the matter. The partners argue the lucrative North American business can more than offset a China retreat, some of the people said, declining to be identified as the details are private.
The push to scale back the loss-making China operation is at odds with global managing partner Bob Sternfels, who says the firm needs to maintain its international footprint, which includes offices in around 130 cities across 65 countries.
“Being global is a choice,” Mr Sternfels told staff in a memo late last year. “Frankly, it is the more difficult choice to make. I know this is difficult and may become increasingly so.”
While the memo wasn’t in response to any internal concerns about China, the debate underscores the dilemma facing many high-profile multinational firms caught in the political crosshairs of the world’s two largest economies. Competition for supremacy in everything from computer chips to autos, along with fresh tariffs bring more headwinds for US firms with China operations.[...]"
If those partners think NorthAm business can offset exiting CN, since late last year, why arent they leaving yet?
