He deleted it already, but I remember clearly he said "调查和协助调查还是有很大区别的".Do you have a link to when Ayi said this?
He deleted it already, but I remember clearly he said "调查和协助调查还是有很大区别的".Do you have a link to when Ayi said this?
He deleted it already, but I remember clearly he said "调查和协助调查还是有很大区别的".
I wanted to bring a spotlight on how many people say the western media has been right when they have been wrong just as much if not more times on china specifically. So we shouldn't give them the benefit of the doubt at all. That's how they use media to spin things. Eg. Global campaign to smear chains COVID vaccinesI don't think anyone here has said to take them at face value though? I've only seen "treat it as a rumour, wait and see" at most.
What you think? Was the headline/article misleading?
I like how FirstPost used a CRH380A in an article talking about wanting to build a 250 kph train.From nov20,2024:
"Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train: Is India looking at alternatives to Japan for project?
India had initially announced that the country’s first bullet train, which would run between Ahmedabad and Mumbai — a pet project of Prime Minister Narendra Modi — would be operational by 2022. However, repeated delays and escalating costs now have India looking to suppliers in Europe.
[....]
According to a report in Hindustan Times, the Centre wants to launch the service in 2026.
This, a year ahead of the polls in Gujarat.
However, the Japanese have been unable to give a firm commitment to the deadline."
[....]
"The development comes just months after Union Railway Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw led a team to Japan to sort out a series of issues with the project, as per The Hindu.
Vaishnaw was accompanied by NHSRCL managing director Vivek Kumar Gupta and Railway Board member (Infrastructure) Anil Kumar Khandelwal.
Among the issues discussed on the three-day trip were Japan insisting that only Japanese vendors be used for the trains and signalling systems[....]"
"
But changing suppliers midway won’t be easy.
“Issuing a (new) global tender for the project may be construed as sidestepping Japan and it could impact bilateral ties. Hence, a section of the government wants to persuade Tokyo to agree to source some of the components from Europe to expeditiously complete the project,” the second person told Hindustan Times.
“Their (Japan) concurrence is also desirable as they are funding the project through long-term loan at a concessional rate.” "
------------
Why does India need to buy highspeed train from abroad if they can build one themselves, as they claim they they will, with comparable quality?...
From April2024:
"India will soon see home-built bullet trains chugging on various routes. Interestingly, India-built bullet trains, work on which has already begun, will be faster than any of the trains which are currently being plied by the Indian Railways.
A report by Economic Times quoted a top government official saying that India made bullet train will run at the speed of over 250 kilometres per hour (kmph).
The speed of home-built bullet trains in India will be similar to high-speed trains in various parts of the globe which ply at over 250 kmph including the French TGV and the Japanese Shinkansen."
Middle income trap denotes a hypothesis about middle income countries to begin with, which China isn't.That is not the question to be asking in my opinion.
The real question (actually there are two of them pertaining to this topic), and the first question why take these anti-China people seriously?
Their objections basically are frivolous and half the time totally out to lunch.
The topic is the middle income trap and how China intends to break it.
With the Chinese middle class getting smaller because more people are getting richer, according to their arbitrary levels pulled out of who knows where, the obvious conclusion is China is going to step into being a high income nation, as defined by the UN if I remember correctly.
Simple point, a related one, with the Chinese economy growing at 5% or more, reaching high income status for the nation is just a matter of time, which will happen soon.
This is very significant, from an academic point of view. If China can do it, what about other countries?
Forget about the South Koreas and Japan and Taiwan of the world, for geopolitical reasons they had an open market, the largest in the world the USA to sell their products into.
Other developing countries today do not have that luxury of that kind of openness to markets in the West like in the past.
That is China soft power. Optimism for the future, for your own damn country. How to make it succeed, so we do not have to be an Indian and run and emigrate.
That is Western soft power. Stupidity compounded. Everything is bad, because they say it is, and no evidence is necessary, because they said so. Dumb and Dumber. That movie deserved a few Oscars.
What I find amazing, is that they cannot break out of repeating the same narrative, that everything is bad. The problem there is that it is a losing narrative. Over time, less and less people will pay attention because they know it is all false.
China moves forward. The West, not as much.
No, he's a retard. We're not doing anything different than US buying out sanctions weakened Ukrainian and EU land, government and companies. The point is to integrate defense systems, economies and resource lanes, so we can contain the military aggression of the USA.He's right but there's something he didn't say. China also use Russian resources to produce far cheaper than european and all US allied that make them unable to compete anymore. Which means china also take the greater advantage on them.
Europe: donate all assets and access rights in Russia to Russia, who then sells them for cheap to ChinaNo, he's a retard. We're not doing anything different than US buying out sanctions weakened Ukrainian and EU land, government and companies. The point is to integrate defense systems, economies and resource lanes, so we can contain the military aggression of the USA.