Miscellaneous News

_killuminati_

Senior Member
Registered Member
toronto-vs-chengdu-1536x1048.png
Toronto will be like that even in 2100. Maybe even shorter lines.

Stupid Euro trash deceived by the movies"Ghandi " or worse "Eat ,Pray ,Love" more like "Run ,Hide,Survive"-Stupid is as stupid does"They should have watch more realistic movies on India like "Phoolan Devi:Bandit Queen"the horrific treatment of women are graphically shown-India is such a monstrous,degenerate shithole.
Or they could read an actual biography of Gandhi, especially the part where he denigrated blacks in Africa, his infatuation with pedarasty, or his gay lovers.
Racist quotes of Gandhi :-

1. “It was a gross injustice to seek to place Indians in the same class as the Kaffirs.”

2. “Thanks to the Court’s decision, only clean Indians or Coloured people other than Kaffirs can now travel by the trams.”

3. “Boer leaders should not consider Indians as being on the same level as Kaffirs.”

4. “The Boer mind refused to recognize the evident and sharp distinctions that undoubtedly exist between British Indians and the Kaffir races in South Africa.”

5. “If registration is made compulsory, there will be no difference between Indians and Kaffirs.”

6. “Kaffirs are as a rule uncivilised – the convicts even more so. They are troublesome, very dirty and live almost like animals. The reader can easily imagine the plight of the poor Indian thrown into such company!”

7. “The British rulers take us to be so lowly and ignorant that they assume that, like the Kaffirs who can be pleased with toys and pins, we can also be fobbed off with trinkets.”

8. “Many of the Native prisoners are only one degree removed from the animal and often created rows and fought among themselves in their cells.”

9. “We were then marched off to a prison intended for Kaffirs. There, our garments were stamped with the letter ‘N,’ which meant that we were being classed with the Natives. We were all prepared for hardships, but not quite for this experience. We could understand not being classed with the whites, but to be placed on the same level with the Natives seemed too much to put up with.

10. “I observed with regret that some Indians were happy to sleep in the same room as the Kaffirs. We may entertain no aversion to Kaffirs, but we cannot ignore the fact that there is no common ground between them and us in the daily affairs of life.”

11. "I have, though, resolved in my mind on an agitation to ensure that Indian prisoners are not lodged with Kaffirs or others.”

12. “There was urgent need for separate lavatories for Indians. I also told him that Indian prisoners should never be lodged with Kaffirs. The Governor immediately issued an order for a lavatory for Indians to be sent on from the Central Gaol.”

13. “First, why should we bear such hardships, submit ourselves, for instance, to the restrictions of gaol life, wear coarse and ungainly dress, eat food which is hardly food, starve ourselves, suffer being kicked by the warder, live among the Kaffirs. Better die than suffer this.”

14. “We were locked up with the Kaffirs. There was not a single European officer who described us as Indians. We were called “sammies” or “coolies”.

Source : Collected works of Mahatma Gandhi
H/T : OBADELE KAMBON
Imagine calling out the white man's racism and combating it by racism against natives. That was Gandhi, expressing the same feelings that Indians today express: full sapport saar, we are with you.

He also slept nude with his grand-niece to "test his chastity".
 
Last edited:

_killuminati_

Senior Member
Registered Member
Same for the Union Station renovation. 10 years so far
I was going through Union st almost daily for 10 years until ~2018 and it was under reno the entire time. Maybe my grand kids will see it finish.

What are the chances that the increasing number of guns around him are the ones that opened fire on him? That possibility didn't cross his mind, albeit it did brush his ears.
 
Last edited:

GZDRefugee

Junior Member
Registered Member
China of 1930s had even less than Iran today and still fought. The difference is not about national strength but about calibre of people and frankly, I see Iranians as no different to cow belt Indians especially given Iranian intransigence when it came to china‘s generous billion dollar deal back in 2021. Infiltration and penetration of the Iranian security establishment such that Iranian presidents and scientists are assassinated make me doubt such assertions of Iranian intelligence passing American spyware to China, which lead to China closing the cia nets during the Obama years.
China of 1950 fought against a nuclear power despite having none of their own.
 

Minm

Junior Member
Registered Member
China of 1930s had even less than Iran today and still fought. The difference is not about national strength but about calibre of people and frankly, I see Iranians as no different to cow belt Indians especially given Iranian intransigence when it came to china‘s generous billion dollar deal back in 2021. Infiltration and penetration of the Iranian security establishment such that Iranian presidents and scientists are assassinated make me doubt such assertions of Iranian intelligence passing American spyware to China, which lead to China closing the cia nets during the Obama years.

China of 1950 fought against a nuclear power despite having none of their own.
China in 1930 and 1950 was still a lot more powerful relative to the US than Iran today. China had more than 500 million people in 1950 and superpower support from the Soviet Union. The US didn't use nukes against China because they were worried about soviet retaliation. Nobody is going to attack Israel in response to a nuclear attack against Iran

Fighting a land invasion is simple even for less developed countries. Iran fought when it was invaded by Iraq in 1980. But fighting against Israel is much more complicated because of the distance. It's much more comparable to the Taiwan issue. China fought for some of the small islands, but could never touch Taiwan itself. That's how poor or middle income countries fight against rich countries.

I think the problem with China's generous deal with Iran is that not much has materialised and China is hesitating to invest in Iran. It's an understandable logic, western markets are too valuable to lose just to assert your sovereignty and trade with Iran. But the disappointment that engagement with China didn't lead to much economic development is exactly why the new president was elected to negotiate with the west. China won't implement the deal unless America approves, apparently
 

GZDRefugee

Junior Member
Registered Member
China had more than 500 million people in 1950 and superpower support from the Soviet Union.
The Soviets withholding much needed hardware and logistical support was one of the reasons Sino-Soviet relations soured. Additionally the Soviet nuclear arsenal was fledgeling, they just barely managed to test one detonation in August 1949. They could have nuked Europe maybe, but no chance in hell would they be able to nuke the CONUS.
 

pmc

Major
Registered Member
The Soviets withholding much needed hardware and logistical support was one of the reasons Sino-Soviet relations soured. Additionally the Soviet nuclear arsenal was fledgeling, they just barely managed to test one detonation in August 1949. They could have nuked Europe maybe, but no chance in hell would they be able to nuke the CONUS.
Tu-4A has the range upto Midwest of US.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

GZDRefugee

Junior Member
Registered Member
Tu-4A has the range upto Midwest of US.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
1727307016321.png

Yeah, the US should be so fucking afraid when faced with the Soviet's 5 nukes compared to their 300. Only one side would have looked like Satan's asshole after that exchange and it wouldn't have been the US.

EDIT: This is also why I think that if China is ever in a position where it holds a WMD advantage over the US, it should use everything it has to obliterate the US without hesitation. Truman stopping MacArthur was a mistake that they will not make again and you can expect the very same treatment should the US ever be in such a position of advantage again.
 
Last edited:

pmc

Major
Registered Member
View attachment 136432

Yeah, the US should be so fucking afraid when faced with the Soviet's 5 nukes compared to their 300. Only one side would have looked like Satan's asshole after that exchange and it wouldn't have been the US.

EDIT: This is also why I think that if China is ever in a position where it holds a WMD advantage over the US, it should use everything they have to obliterate the US without hesitation. Truman stopping MacArthur was a mistake that they will not make again and you can expect the very same treatment should the US ever be in such a position of advantage again.
I have read they already have dozens in 1951s. and this the most they could fly with Tu-4A bombers.
 
Top