Miscellaneous News

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Ive always said its better to put Iran in BRICS over India. A smaller country that is reliable is always better than a big one that isn't.

Just put India with the west. They will do more damage that way since India is a rather crappy ally all things considered.
When India is an enemy and you don't believe they are acting in good faith, its way easier to deal with them. Its why Jai Hind cannot deal with Pakistan even though they keep saying how stupid they are.
India has overplayed its hand. They think their membership is worth popular core policy, they must be excluded.

IDK if BRICS has mechanism for kick, but lets be real, if core members agree (payment is whole reason they signed up) any rule can be made on spot.
I actually think india should be kicked out of BRICS, especially after they stonewalled the expansion of BRICS last meeting. In fact, i reckon the indian passport should have the same amount of power and access as Afghanistan, especially after the shitty behaviour (pun intended) of indians outside of india, to say nothing of their behaviour inside of india!

It was already bad when india wanted to make english an official language in BRICS, they're obviously traitors and have nothing comparable to the Non Aligned Movement of the Cold War, all of their elites compromised by anglo patronage and schooling.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Its over.

Trump thought he was debating Biden.

Kamala chose the right strategy in the debate. Trump ultimately lost the debate IMO and this’ll be reflected in the polls.

Therefore, Trump obliterated.
I don't know about that. To the people who like Trump, he didn't say anything wrong and he Kamala didn't say anything electrifying. It was just Trump being Trump repeating baseless aggressive attacks and Kamala being boring and normal but with a high pitched voice.

Trump didn't gain his following by being super reasonable and killing people off at debate. He gained his following by being a loud and aggressive alpha white guy and he didn't lose any of that. You also have to remember society's subconscious expectations and how they shape the way people like or dislike a candidate or person in general. Those who dislike Kamala don't like childless career-oriented sharp-tongued women and she didn't make any headway there. They didn't like that about Hillary as well even though it was clear she was a better person for the job than Trump. Did Hillary do any worse debating him than Kamala?

Overall, Trump went in facing a lawyer by profession who has 20 years of mental acuity over him so given that, neither did any surprising damage to the other. And Trump's ending point was actually quite strong; he said why would we trust Kamala to get any of these things done if she's already had 3.5 years to do them but didn't?
 
Last edited:

plawolf

Lieutenant General
For maximum trolling send Type 075 and RORO ships for amphibious assault exercise. US side can play defense and China can play offense. Winner gets NFT image of President Tsai and President Lai bumping nasties.

Surely it should be the looser?! Having to see such horrors should be considered torture and soldiers will fight 10 times harder to avoid the psychological damage.
 

HighGround

Senior Member
Registered Member
I don't know about that. To the people who like Trump, he didn't say anything wrong and he Kamala didn't say anything electrifying. It was just Trump being Trump repeating baseless aggressive attacks and Kamala being boring and normal but with a high pitched voice.

Trump didn't gain his following by being super reasonable and killing people off at debate. He gained his following by being a loud and aggressive alpha white guy and he didn't lose any of that. You also have to remember society's subconscious expectations and how they shape the way people like or dislike a candidate or person in general. Those who dislike Kamala don't like childless career-oriented sharp-tongued women and she didn't make any headway there. They didn't like that about Hillary as well even though it was clear she was a better person for the job than Trump. Did Hillary do any worse debating him than Kamala?

Overall, Trump went in facing a lawyer by profession who has 20 years of mental acuity over him so given that, neither did any surprising damage to the other. And Trump's ending point was actually quite strong; he said why would we trust Kamala to get any of these things done if she's already had 3.5 years to do them but didn't?
Trump was already on the backfoot. He was behind Harris in the polls and was only trending further behind. He needed this debate win.

Was Trump actually destroyed? No. But he pretty clearly lost. The fact that even Trump's major supporters like Elon Musk and Elbridge Colby are being salty about his loss tells us pretty much everything we want to know.

1726036549661.png
1726036582475.png


Remember, public debates like this aren't about who actually "won". It's about optics, and Conservatives are whining about bias and hosts because Harris ultimately gained the upper-hand.

Brb, gonna go look for a cat and dog to eat.
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
They’re covering their ass for the government inquiry that is sure to come their way, there was so much corruption and nepotism going on in the selection process that the Australian people are demanding answers, so their strategy is to pass it off as good humour and say, see Raygun is a decent dancer after all!!

I think we know now why China has been aggressive towards India what with the PLA in the disputed borders and lately especially after Jaishankar's comment regarding China:


Indians are so jealous of China that they will compromise global south freedom from anglo hegemony just to shit on China.
Yeah, who is foolish enough to trade with Cow Dung, that's what India bring to the table.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Trump was already on the backfoot. He was behind Harris in the polls and was only trending further behind. He needed this debate win.

Was Trump actually destroyed? No. But he pretty clearly lost. The fact that even Trump's major supporters like Elon Musk and Elbridge Colby are being salty about his loss tells us pretty much everything we want to know.

View attachment 135528
View attachment 135529


Remember, public debates like this aren't about who actually "won". It's about optics, and Conservatives are whining about bias and hosts because Harris ultimately gained the upper-hand.

Brb, gonna go look for a cat and dog to eat.
I don't believe any polls since Trump beat Hillary. Everything in the news before that election night was saying Hillary will destroy Trump and Trump is flailing helplessly. That's just wishful liberal media with their fresh mouths thinking they can talk themselves into their preferred reality. I was in NYC; people said Trump is a bad joke and the joke ends tonight.

I was at the gym when the election got to the half point. I remembered thinking that those numbers don't quite look as they should for a Hillary landslide. So I headed to the bar to get in on the action. And it was there that I saw Trump win and I got to people-watch liberal snowflakes crying. My cousin attended Wellesley and I heard it was a feast for the eyes there; you could drown Michael Phelp on max dose asthma meds in those waves of tears.

So in any case, I don't trust the polls and while I don't care if Trump or Harris wins, I kinda wanna see Trump win cus the liberal meltdowns seem so much more juicy! And I see the exact pattern of how Hillary lost reoccurring in this election.
 

pmc

Major
Registered Member
This also happened:

Russians ISR have improved a lot lately and continue to improve. HIMARS and M270 are getting bombed left right and center in Kursk.

It is this external Pod in Su-34 that is detecting upto 85% of conceal targets and real time transmission to various strike platform. but strange thing is that info was one of Arabic Channel a year ago. .
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Su-34 frontline bombers are equipped with a new stratospheric strike and reconnaissance complex
The system is capable of transmitting target coordinates in real time to ground strike assets, as well as aviation. Aircraft operating in the stratosphere will transmit data for the Smerch and Tornado-S MLRS, Iskander systems, frontline aviation, including helicopter units with high-precision LMUR missiles. All the equipment of the stratospheric reconnaissance complex is placed in three containers. The UKR-RT variant is designed for conducting radio-technical reconnaissance, UKR-OE – for optical-electronic, UKR-RL – for radar. The new complex will solve the problem of low efficiency of detecting well-camouflaged enemy equipment by conventional infrared reconnaissance UAVs, which detect no more than 15-25% of targets
For this purpose, a telescopic observation mode with a resolution of up to 30 centimeters is provided.

1726037066151.png
 
Top