One thing that stands out to me is the guy didn't include DF-26s in his post
China's foreign debt is comparatively small. CEIC actually has data on external debt owed (total public and private debt owed to non-residents repayable in internationally accepted currencies, goods or services):are you saying China's public debts are in other currencies?
Country/Organization | External Debt (USD millions) |
China (Sep 2022) | 2,481,504.6 |
US (Sep 2022) | 24,350,913.0 |
Japan (Dec 2022) | 4,298,045.6 |
EU (Sep 2022) | 16,222,952.4 |
India (Sep 2022) | 610,467.4 |
Russia (Dec 2022) | 381,770.0 |
Good. I like your argument. If more Americans and China-haters can think and count like you. More Chinese can sleep easier at night.@Sardaukar said:
"Their debt does not compare to the monstrous debts of Japan and the US."
China's national debt is five trillion BIGGER than that of the US. And $20 trillion more than Japan's
Sardaukar wrote:
"So it really can survive an economic crisis."
Unlikely... Because it will simply have nowhere to sell its products... If everyone is in crisis - China is the worst off. Mass unemployment and related unrest - the Chinese government is unlikely to survive...
Sardaukar wrote:
"China is already at the level of 7nm technology, which is in line with modern technology."
China, but not that one. Island China, Taiwan is there.
I’m not trying to be stupid, but this looks like a good solution to me:Back on the topic of AR and Ukranian conflict, what do people in this thread think about air assualt and paratroopers? It seems that the VDV have been relegated to elite shocktroopers compared to the very first days of the war when they stormed Hostomel airport via air assualt.
Since then neither side have had much luck with helicopter borne troops and helicopters are now rarely seen on the front line in any sort of troop carrying capacity.
With the proliferation of Manpads it seems that helicopter intrusion into even lightly defended areas are highly risky, which makes paratrooper assualt basically a suicide mission if attempted without air supremmacy.
But that "flying car" is just a different type of Helicopter.I’m not trying to be stupid, but this looks like a good solution to me:
In a few years these could be widespread in civilian use, they will come with built in AESA, all you need to do is add an active protection system, if it gets shot down then it’s only a couple, or a few guys lost at worst, because they also come with built in parachutes.
Ok, in other words the solution is to have better and much cheaper helicopters then, that carry fewer people, fly themselves automatically and can reasonably defend themselves. Possibly armoured.But that "flying car" is just a different type of Helicopter.
PLA has already has small flying vehicle that can take 2 riders or more. You can find them in Army section in this forum, I think.Ok, in other words the solution is to have better and much cheaper helicopters then, that carry fewer people, fly themselves automatically and can reasonably defend themselves. Possibly armoured.
Lol, yeah I do love them, so the concept is quite familiar.