Ladakh Flash Point

siegecrossbow said:

We can argue all day and that doesn’t change the ground reality. What has happened has happened. You winning the media war on Twitter, Wikipedia, or even this forum does not change that. One side has provided photographic and video evidence and the other hasn’t. It is like when Pakistan has shot down a MIG, they provided numerous photos of the wreckage from different angles and parades the pilot through a village. India claimed to have shot down a F-16 but provided no such evidence.

Click to expand...

both photographic and satellite imagery evidence also confirms the Chinese withdrawal, which some here are trying to deny. Honestly, at this point, how many casualties and pows each side suffered doesn'r really matter anymore, I think we can all agree it is unfortunate that soldiers on both sides lost their lives.

Ash the rational said:

You guys are still discussing galwan clash.
There had been more fierce battle even before galwan.Im pretty after 100 years very few will remember that.
The chinese soldiers are died and so are indian soldiers .Their soul already departed.And only thing they will carry with them is thier merits and nothing else.
Instead of crying over the dead.I as a person personally believe that are n number of countries with n number if boundaries everyone is patrotic and everyone blood boils .The one who forgive is benevolent irrespective of the fact who was right and who was wrong in a situation.
The chinese side alleges Indian side did a ambush whereas indian side have a different story.
There is no need to get so worked up.After all we all have to die one day with nothing in our hands.

Click to expand...

The Galwan clash is irrelevant at this point, because we now know that China failed to reach its 1959 claim liine and status quo ante was restored in Galwan as well as Pangong Tso, the other main conflict area. Of course, it is unfortunate soldiers died on both sides.

Lol the fact that a FP article(which usually posts anti India/Modi stuff) triggers so many here shows that some members here haven't yet come to terms with the Chinese withdrawal.

twineedle said:

Lol the fact that a FP article(which usually posts anti India/Modi stuff) triggers so many here shows that some members here haven't yet come to terms with the Chinese withdrawal.

Click to expand...

FP is anti India/Modi? Really? So they reporting on the martial law and real genocide in kashmir (i.e. people being killed by bullets?) I didnt think so.

jfy1155 said:

Indians cheer the video of group of Indian soldiers beating an unarmed PLA soldier but complain this video is old. This video is more humiliating for Indians.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303343494765797378

Click to expand...

What's up with the guys in the back doing jack all and not helping their friend?

twineedle said:

The Galwan clash is irrelevant at this point, because we now know that China failed to reach its 1959 claim liine and status quo ante was restored in Galwan as well as Pangong Tso, the other main conflict area. Of course, it is unfortunate soldiers died on both sides.

Click to expand...

And they are unarmed, outnumbered, ambushed, in middle of night, like someone is trying to deny, right?

Not to mention,after horribly failing to do what they said in their parliament, they ran away like cowards when PLA showed up.

lp1g said:

video only shows Chinese officer's skull wide open by Indian soldiers.

Click to expand...

And it shows busted & banged up indian apes begging for lives even in coma

twineedle said:

I have already posted an interview between Nitin ghokale and S Dinnny, but I will post it again.

Snehesh Alex Phillip is a pretty well known defence journalist, search for him and you will find his articles. He has been reporting on the standoff and was one of the first to report on the disengagement deal in detail.

Click to expand...

Hopefully they are better than your wannabe warriors

So close, yet so far. When you try applying logic to a problem you think you know the answer to, nothing makes sense. Too bad he didn’t consider the other possibility. If he did, he’d be coming much closer to the truth.

twineedle said:

both photographic and satellite imagery evidence also confirms the Chinese withdrawal, which some here are trying to deny.

Click to expand...

Whatever withdrawal was done was done to allow India to save face and learn its lesson. It's not a big deal because the PLA can be back there any day they want; who would stop them? We deny only that the withdrawal was due to Indian capability; it was due to Chinese mercy.

twineedle said:

Honestly, at this point, how many casualties and pows each side suffered doesn'r really matter anymore, I think we can all agree it is unfortunate that soldiers on both sides lost thier lives.

Click to expand...

Cus as Kakyan said, Indian lives are expendable so Indian casualties and POWs don't matter. The Chinese don't say that about our soldiers.

twineedle said:

The Galwan clash is irrelevant at this point,

Click to expand...

Everything India loses is immediately irrelevant LOL

It's relevant because it puts the whole conflict into perspective. This is not some muddled disagreement between 2 neighbors who just cannot see each other's sides; everything here was caused by India's evil and cowardly intent.

twineedle said:

because we now know that China failed to reach its 1959 claim liine and status quo ante was restored in Galwan as well as Pangong Tso, the other main conflict area.

Click to expand...

We don't know that. Only Indians "know" that and repeat defeated points to preserve false dignity.

twineedle said:

Of course, it is unfortunate soldiers died on both sides.

Click to expand...

Awww, you're such a nice guy. Only like a really really nice guy would say this line twice in 2 posts back to back.

twineedle said:

Lol the fact that a FP article(which usually posts anti India/Modi stuff) triggers so many here shows that some members here haven't yet come to terms with the Chinese withdrawal.

Click to expand...

I don't think anyone's denying that China withdrew as much as they said they would. It's Indians who can't come to terms with the fact that being given back less land than China took doesn't count as status quo and that even that was given to them mercifully as they can get nothing from China by force.