Ladakh Flash Point

Status
Not open for further replies.
N

nemo

Junior Member
plawolf said:
You talk was if you believe the Indian fake news media version of events.

The PLA only killed 4-5 Indians in actual combat, and even then it would have been through actual combat rather than cowardly executions as they Indians did.

Most of the Indian fatalities came from fleeing too hard.

No one on the Indian side did a mag dump for very simple reasons, firstly the PLA never backed them into such a corner where they believed they would be killed for certain (surrender was always an option), so there was no real need; the second reason would be that it wasn’t only the Indian troops who were armed with firearms. If you were Indian troops who where getting your butts beat black and blue in melee, you would literally need to be suicidal to want to escalate that to firearms; and thirdly but maybe most importantly, then Indians who could were all too busy fleeing as hard as they could to think about shooting.
Click to expand...

Personally, I think the 3 India dead "in combat" were actually deliberate executions for dishonorable Indian attack on the Chinese negotiators. It was hard to target, during heat of combat, the precise opposite numbers on the Indian side. It was more likely that they were captured, then deliberately beaten to death in retaliation. Note also one of the Chinese dead was due to rescuing comrades being washed away by the stream, so that didn't count for the pay back. This was probably why China only released portions of the video.
 
J20 RTS

J20 RTS

Junior Member
Registered Member
plawolf said:
You talk was if you believe the Indian fake news media version of events.

The PLA only killed 4-5 Indians in actual combat, and even then it would have been through actual combat rather than cowardly executions as they Indians did.

Most of the Indian fatalities came from fleeing too hard.

No one on the Indian side did a mag dump for very simple reasons, firstly the PLA never backed them into such a corner where they believed they would be killed for certain (surrender was always an option), so there was no real need; the second reason would be that it wasn’t only the Indian troops who were armed with firearms. If you were Indian troops who where getting your butts beat black and blue in melee, you would literally need to be suicidal to want to escalate that to firearms; and thirdly but maybe most importantly, then Indians who could were all too busy fleeing as hard as they could to think about shooting.
Click to expand...
I reckon no one carried any bullets at all. Judging how ill-discipline the Indians troops were. When the push come to shove and your life is in mortal danger. The temptation to load up a mag and start spraying would be too great to resist.
 
J

jfy1155

Junior Member
Registered Member
coolieno99

coolieno99

Junior Member
longmarch said:
Ok kids, let me teach you this:
When PLA or red army started, they started as gurilla, small and appeared weak, as it should be. Even as they grew stronger, like in Korean War, it's still appeared weak in terms of raw power, which fits their image.


Now you are God damn military and economic superpower, nobody buys your weak image. Joke is on your side and the best you can do is to defend your interests with factual information. Because you don't have 5 eyes to help you dispense rumors.

You are not a gurilla force anymore. You need to change your mindset and modernize your operations. To do that, you need to change your organization and fire those middle-kindom thinking ones!

Your obsession with who I am is absurd. I'm just not gonna tell you
Click to expand...
I think I understand your analysis. In both American and Bollywood action movies, the Villains always outnumber the Good Guys by a 10 to 1 ratio or more. And in any ensuing battles, the Villains always suffered more deaths and casualties than the Good Guys. Looking at the recent video of the Galwan incident, the Indians easily outnumbered the Chinese by a 10-to-1 ratio. But the Chinese still managed to killed more Indians , 20-to-4 ratio. This result is something one see in a Bollywood movie, except the characters are switched around. For an Indian who's watching Bollywood all his life, this probably would cause a fuse to blow in his brain, and cannot think coherently anymore. Because the Indian soldiers would be seen as the Villains, even to the Indians themselves.
 
Last edited:
N

nemo

Junior Member
coolieno99 said:
I think I understand your analysis. In both American and Bollywood action movies, the Villains always outnumber the Good Guys by a 10 to 1 ratio or more. And in any ensuing battles, the Villains always suffered more deaths and casualties than the Good Guys. Looking at the recent video of the Galwan incident, the Indians easily outnumbered the Chinese by a 10-to-1 ratio. But the Chinese still managed to killed more Indians , 20-to-4 ratio. This result is something one see in a Bollywood movie, except the characters are switched around. For an Indian who's watching Bollywood all his life, this probably would cause a fuse to blow in his brain, and cannot think coherently anymore.
Click to expand...

It's actually worse than that -- it's at least 80 to zero. 3 Chinese are dead before the Chinese force arrived. The single dead was caused by accident during rescue of others. There were at least 80 Indians present that participated in the combat -- the 20 dead, about 20 captured, and another 40 captured and released on spot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top