China didn't get to where she is by being stupid. My take is that disengagement area is left as kill zone. Let's wait and see what happens next time indians show up there.Chinese leadership don't understand Indian but People in Singapore and Malaysia knows the Indian too well having live and work together for the past 100 years
I would think it unwise for China to let India get away so easily after what they done. Yes China play the strategic game but from a tactical point of view, the Indian will come back once they perceive weakness in opponents.
And yes, i understand China is eager to court India and work together but it a wishful thinking on China's part for the past few decades . Indian think of geopolitics as a zero sum game and can never think of working forward to a win-win outcome. That their paranoid nature and mentality and it not China's job to educate the Indian.
Hence i say forget it. Forcus your attention on Pakistan and SL instead
As for now disengagement may bring short term peace to the border but i am pretty sure the indian will be back again. India needs more than another 62 thrashing. China needs to ensure india get 2 bullets on their heads the next time. (see the link below)
Hey I though India gone full decoupling with China, what gives?
@MwRYum cause the media had mistakenly follow the Indian head bobble or head shake gesture as an answer...LOLHey I though India gone full decoupling with China, what gives?
Agreed. The Chinese government can learn about Indian culture anytime, it is widely available knowledge. Unfortunately to learn about the Indian mind, its a whole different matter. There no classes or books for that. All that knowledge to understand the Indian mind by the Chinese communities in Singapore and Malaysia comes from experience, not courses. The governments and institutions in Singapore and Malaysia cannot officially teach China on how to truly understand the Indian mind, because that would be seen as undermining their own racial harmony. So the Chinese government would have to learn this covertly, on the street level.
That being said, the ethnic Indian communities in Malaysia and Singapore, no matter how negative some of their traits, they could never match the Indians. We cannot equate the overseas Indian communities with actual Indians. Because they have learnt to live as a minority community for generations. And they have access to much better education than the average Indians in India. Take Kishore Mabubani for example, he is nothing like the Indians we typically laugh at. This is a model statesman, who was able to serve as the President of the UN Security Council in 2001-2002. He considers himself Singaporean, not Indian. There are practically no Jai Hinds or Bhakts in Malaysia and Singapore. Their kind are too alien to thrive in those societies. Finding them in these countries would be the same as trying to find FLG communities there.
Therefore, learning about the Indian mind in Malaysian and Singapore can only get us to around level 5 at most. It would give a good foundation. But Indians are actually beyond level 10. So, if the Chinese government is looking for a crash-course. I would think that the best consultants would have to come from South Asia. Learning from Pakistan would be a good start. Pakistan had much experience being on the receiving end of Indian violence and propaganda.
No worse than this traitor that yelled in Mandarian to "dont shoot, Im a Chinese person"According Chinese media, there's a bounty on the head of his Asian looking Indian soldier who was the first lunged at Chinese commander.with a knife. Turns out this guy is 24 yrs old and from Manipur, who betrayed his home land as he was captive in the hands of indian. He was a local communist liberation army guerilla fighter of resistance movement against India. Now he serving for India.
PLA will target him if they ever see him again.
This line about feeling better again cus you have nothing else to say? OK, I guess I'll respond the same as last time too.Say what you want to make yourself feel better. The facts say otherwise.
Nobody who initiates conflict like the Indian ambush is trying to preserve the status quo, and even if they retrospectively drop their standards there, they still lie to meet it. It's par for Indian style.India's strategic goals were simple:
As I said, "If India suffered military humiliation losing soldiers in a cowardly ambush and an unverified amount of land, then the strategic goal was to obfuscate the land lost and say you kept the status quo."Keep Chinese patrols past the Johnson line(finger 8)
Prevent China from millitarizing/occupying the buffer zone/disputed area
Prevent China from violating the de facto lac of 1993(finger 4, Galwan river bend, etc.)
Secure its infrastructure projects, which China objected to(DSDBO, Galwan/Shyok bridges, etc.)
All were met.
On the Manipur guy, not so much on his background but more to the fact he was the first one to confront the Chinese commander with a knife. That's why PLA put a bounty on his head next time they see him.No worse than this traitor that yelled in Mandarian to "dont shoot, Im a Chinese person"