And then you will retreat, like you did this past week. Your own government confirmed that. All the "territory" you claimed to have captured is under Indian control.
Ladakh Flash Point
- Thread starter Mt1701d
- Start date
- Status
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
I dunno, all the things that Indians say are lies; it's too weird to argue details. It's just obvious that China's a far superior force and whatever you have it was given to you by China's mercy, just like it is by Pakistan's mercy that you have your disposable pilot back. If China wants or if you act up again, we take it again with ease.
Nothing can debunk that because China just keeps winning everywhere. Too bad Indians are shielded by their incompetent government to believed that they can accomplish things, especially against a power like China. If they were honest and Indians knew what was going on, they might hold their government accountable and not trail hopelessly behind China at everything today from a position of superiority after WWII.
Like I said, we're done with you after you backed off. And for your land and dead people, we will show you that a retreat by an actual professional military doesn't involve people scurrying into frozen rivers and off cliffs. If you wanna see another demonstration, it'll cost you again because we have to beat you every time to do one.
First of all, there's no such thing as Indian control because they don't even control their own capital apparently. Secondly, really? China confirmed that? Show me. Because if they didn't that just makes you another Indian liar again.
Last edited:
If the Indians are confident in their so called victory then they wouldn't need to go to such lengths to defend it, some times from other Indian detractors.
Different regions.
Galwan isn't Depsang.
Pangong Tso isn't South Tibet.
Why keep regurgitating these rebutted claims?
So now 8 Chinese died. Staying true to the 2x+n formula I see, but they messed up the variable, it was supposed to be x = indian deaths.
I love how their casualties estimations went from being based on the number of helicopters sorties to being based on the number of stretchers. The use of these estimations only indicate that it was the PLA that swept and cleaned the battlefield, as the Indians were routed.
Which region are you talking about?
There has been a disengagement at Pangong Tso with Indian advances at Kailash ranges negated over the agreement north of Pangong Tso.
Sounding very desperate and seems to have resorted to trolling.
Troll.
Earlier, it was that India never patrolled. Before that India didn't lose land, before that India pushed out Chinese invaders .
Now it's, "China failed to gain an inch of territory". A statement devoid of much truth but intended to derail the thread.
If all it takes to be an Indian hero is to twirl a stick then this guy can be the greatest Indian hero ever.
Yes. I don't recall disengagement at Galwan happening in July 2020. There were a few Indian media articles to suggest this but all of them used the river flooding as evidence that PLA moved all the way back. The camps set up on the bank were removed when the water level rose. This doesn't necessarily mean total disengagement because if there was at Galwan, it should have set precedence for disengagement in multiple confrontation spots back in July already. Don't know recall there being any formal, official recognition of that.
Show me evidence of July disengagement in Galwan please. And make it real don't waste everyone's time with random Indian media articles. I know they've said a range of things that were proven untrue and iirc that includes several reports of disengagement after the June clash... you know to preserve Jai Hind minds from imploding.
Your Jai Hind colonel Dunny isn't an authority on this issue surely you understand this right??
lol
He's saying this now but for years we all know that IA and PLA have held up banners asking the other's patrol party to return when they have approached beyond their respective claim lines. This should indicate that IA patrols FREQUENTLY walked up well beyond finger 4. Enough times to warrant banners from being produced and issued lol. The same goes for PLA.
For every Dunny that claims x,y,z after the disengagement to portray a facesaving situation for India, there were MANY Indians and opposition leaders/ military ones who implied that IA patrolled up to finger 8 and lamenting the fact that PLA settling onto finger 4, prevented IA from performing patrols they always did in the past.
Patrolling up to claimed borders was quite common and the buffer zone was only established in earnest after these actual disengagement agreements/action. The buffer zone did not exist in the past. If it did, how do you figure there were so many clashes and pushing fights even before 2020?
- Status