Ladakh Flash Point

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
It is rather this tendency which consists in qualifying as "useful idiot" or "lapdog" any country which associates with the US against China which is stupid. This shows a blindness to the reality of the internal dynamics in each country and It just shows that China is still a young player in the global governance game with little historical experience in diplomacy and still learning the ropes.

By this same logic, China itself is sometimes a "useful idiot" for US.

India is a developing country getting in bed with the biggest imperialist nation USA. India's quarrel with China is based on 17th Century British theft of China's territories. And for that, India is abandoning its future to be a lapdog for USA. While China is genuinely helping develop India's economy. USA will never allow India to be an economic competitor. Indian firms will never be allowed to overtake American firms. Just like what happened with Japan. The implications are dire for India in the long term. That is why they are a useful idiot.

China is not the aggressor here. They were merely trying to push back idiotic Indian aggression. All the while taking blows from a US initiated Cold War.

Well if you want to call China an idiot. Perhaps China is an idiot when it comes to posturing and playing the realpolitik game. China still wants to 'resolutely oppose' or 'voice concern' towards these clearly hostile countries. Being the 'nice guy' guarantees getting pushed around.

China can do so much more. Call the USA and India for what they are: 'Evil Empires'. Insult the hell out of Trump and Modi. Because both are truly clowns. China will be doing the world a favour.

Get serious with forming a strategic and military alliance with Russia. Form a defence pact with Asian countries opposed to India. Isolate India from the rest of Asia. And build up the nuclear arsenal for God's sake.
 
Last edited:

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
LOL, nah! The Quad thing is a stupid idea!

First of all, Japan and Australia are already US allies/servants. What realistic need is there to put them in a so-called Quad? It's not as if they weren't US allies/servants before. Some might argue that "they need to strengthen bilateral defense ties". Sure, but for what? For Containing China? That's laughable, bilateral ties are insignificant for the purpose of containing China. If containing China is their main purpose, they would need first and foremost the close and intimate leadership of the USA. This Asian NATO business sounds like a joke because what determines its effectiveness for its ultimate purpose is the level of involvement of the USA, NOT how closely the other parties (small potatoes) work together.

Secondly, China is a continental power. It will, as a form of civilization, have a large and powerful army, despite whether or not this army even have a realistic potential opponent. And don't dream about turning the multi-military men strong PLA into a oversized marine/expeditionary force, that's fiscally impossible, nor desirable. After the fall of the Soviet Union, Chinese Army (PLAGF) strategically lost the importance it once had, because it lost one of its main purpose/enemy. Yet as a result of Continental Power tradition, the PLAGF will still live on and keep on developing, gobbling up resource to build strength that is not going to be used in any meaningful way. While the main potential opponent of the PLA, the US forces and her allies, are all maritime powers. They don't need to put that much resources in the army. So things were not in China's favor, in terms of optimal use of resources. UNTIL THE IDIOTIC US ADMINISTRATION AND HER ALLIES HAD THE STUPIDITY TO DRAG INDIA INTO THE MIDST.

哈哈哈哈哈, to me, this is the biggest blunder of the century. Some idiotic fat CIA spy head thought that he is smarter than Kissinger Brzezinski. You see, alliance is a double edge sword. An ally could be both your asset or your liability. In the case of India. India already issue with China, the US doesn't need to persuade India to join some king of alliance to build the Indian's animosity towards China. As for the US, Japan, and Australia, all three are effectively outlier island on the outskirt of Eurasia, they only need the navy for their containment strategy. PLAGF was redundant and meaningless in countering the US, Japan and Australia, because they are islands.. Now that India is in a Quad, the PLAGF will all of a sudden be greatly useful in countering the US, Japan and Australia (plus India), because the other three party of the Quad will have an obligation to protect India. This means that the US, Japan and Australia will start diverting resources from Navy to Army, if in case China started a land war with India. This is effectively given the control of the matter to China.

Making a Quad does NOT make the US any more or less involved. But it sounds like the US want to eventually back out of this and let the other three carry the weight of containing China.
I kinda agree that the Quad is a scam job. Its not going to protect India one bit. If India starts a foolish war with China over Ladakh. Would the other 3 of the Quad wanna risk WW3 with China? Anything they can think of doing on China on India's behalf will be too much a price to pay in terms of lives and economy.

The Quad as I see it is a manipulation to get India to be the useful idiot to fight it out with China. The US, Japan, and Australia can 'cheerlead' India, while laughing from behind at its stupidity to doing them a favour to hurt China, but at the same time killing its own future.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
The US, Australia, and Japan will certainly not get involved in a land war with China in the Ladakh region. They won't need to invest more into their ground forces. If the Ladakh conflict actually develop into a full fledged conventional war, there will not be quad boots (except India's) in Ladakh. That's the main issue with Jimmy's opinion on quad. I think the quad is useful in formally acknowledging their shared military goal (led by the US or whatever doesn't matter the important thing is the result). This furthers their perception of "needing" to militarily engage China and so it is very useful for all four of those nations in that regard.

US, Japan, and Australia already have certain interoperability and have had for decades. They basically all use US weapons with pockets of exceptions in non-critical areas except maybe Japan's own missiles which I'm sure can be networked appropriately enough. Indian military interoperability with the three is going to be a long and fruitless endeavor. It would have very little payoff for every situation except a SCS war that involves India or quad war in Indian Ocean which is highly unlikely since China won't contest it and would have no reason to contest anything there. Blocking any strait is hilariously unrealistic despite some Indian and western morons giving it attention. Blocking during a SCS war is more likely though. So again it reverts to SCS war. This is the most likely point of contact and is clearly the source of China's main military attention.
 

escobar

Brigadier
I know. Even if the Martians invade Earth still They will be saying same thing "We firmly oppose..............."
That's why i said before, when it's come to PR stunt & posturing, they are totally hopeless. Even NoKo does it better :rolleyes:

Yes NK does it better. PRC gov give too much importance than necessary to the relationship with US.
That make their PR weak as the objective seem to make US to accept them.
During the trade war Xi were asking US officials why US can't accept China political system like China accept US system.
 

escobar

Brigadier
India is a developing country getting in bed with the biggest imperialist nation USA.
Maybe. So what ?

China is not the aggressor here. They were merely trying to push back idiotic Indian aggression. All the while taking blows from a US initiated Cold War.
Aggression, either it is from China or India is not the main cause of the situation. Just the consequence of two "stupid" (of course at different levels) gov of two countries unable or unwilling to settle their border dispute for multiple reasons.

Get serious with forming a strategic and military alliance with Russia. Form a defence pact with Asian countries opposed to India. Isolate India from the rest of Asia.
More effective policy than calling some coutries "useful idiot".
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
The QUAD is entirely about India. America is trying to achieve a number of strategic objectives with that.

Firstly, America is just using the same playbook as it did during Hillary and Obama’s time in the SCS - overtly support the territorial claims of India, with behind-closed-doors promises of support to encourage India to press their claim to exasperate tensions.

The goal is to either provoke a shooting war, or at a minimum to massively damage Sino-Indian relations to make India much more receptive to American advances for formal military alliances against China.

The aim is to, in the immediate term, divert Chinese attention and resources away from the East to weaken Chinese force disposition and relieve some of the pressure on the likes of Japan and Taiwan, who’s air forces are being run ragged by the need to scramble to ‘intercept’ massive increased PLAAF air activity. With the hope of weakening Chinese Eastern force concentrations enough to make a military strike less suicidal for US and allied forces.

In the medium term, America is looking to try to open up a new front for China in the East by either using Indian forces, or basing American forces on Indian territory to pose a threat to China’s BRI, thereby elevating India in China’s threat assessment from irrelevant annoyance to credible threat.

BRI is China’s next grand project, and if successful, has the potential to render US maritime dominance irrelevant as per Mackinder’s Heartland theory. Which could isolate America and hasten its decline by promoting Asia-Europe trade and co-operation.

The further BRI extends from China, the more branches it will develop, and thus the harder it will be for America to try to counter and contain. Especially given geopolitical realities. As such trying to cut it off at source would be most effective in countering it, which can realistically only be done via India.

The long term ultimate goal for America would be to provoke a clash of civilisations between India and China, thereby locking China in a massive and prolonged war effort, which could drain Chinese resources and blood for a generation like Afghanistan has done to America.

I think Chinese strategists see the danger, which is a key reason as to why China has, and is continuing to be so restrained in the face of non-stop Indian provocations.

Luckily, it looks like China has been able to effectively deter the Indian leadership with its show of strength. All the noise we are hearing now from India is just face-saving shittalk, much like how little thugs would shittalk as they back away from a fight to try to not look like a coward to their buddies.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
The Quad has a chance of working, but not under Trump. Donald Trump is the same guy who wanted South Korean to pay for U.S. soldiers stationed there and Germany/other NATO countries to boost their defense budget higher than 2% of the GDP. He does not make any concessions while expecting the other party to do his biddings.
 

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
The Quad has a chance of working, but not under Trump. Donald Trump is the same guy who wanted South Korean to pay for U.S. soldiers stationed there and Germany/other NATO countries to boost their defense budget higher than 2% of the GDP. He does not make any concessions while expecting the other party to do his biddings.

But don't all these countries (Germany, Japan and korea) all pay for this protection money as a "privilege" of having US troops on their soil? Lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top