And yet you still keep disseminating this type of fake news without any attempt at verification.
Ladakh Flash Point
- Thread starter Mt1701d
- Start date
- Status
But you should have fact checked it. It's yet another random bhakt making yet another unfounded and crazy claim, in this case, Indians killed 100 PLA. Please the PLA returned about 40 captive Indians. How is it possible PLA suffered so greatly and yet captured so many Indians and killed over 20 of their's including their senior commander and officers?
Nevermind the fact that this guy is using a random picture with a Chinese person in it and making the crazy claims. As far as fake news from India comes, this one is even more hilarious than the others.
Lol, i was making jokes. I know what it is.
Why should we verify indian fake news except taking the fun?I found it funny
I've never seen a country lie as loudly and blatantly as this. China has issued NO such de-escalation and confirmed nothing made up by these lying rats. How can they speak for the CCP?! Where is the reputation of Indians and their media?! Why don't they quote the CCP and provide links and videos to the CCP confirming de-escalation? It's embarrassing if we weren't on the receiving end of such frustrating lies. I guess when you lost everything like the Indians and you're forced to dwell in the world's biggest cesspit slum, there's no such thing as face or shame or reputation anyway.
China will not want to expend too many of its high value munitions against India; however, the assumption that the PLAAF's tactics need to mirror that of the US in Iraq/Syria doesn't make sense to me. I would assume that China's Western Theater Command reserves something like 15-20% of China's missile arsenal for the Indian front. The PLAAF's goal would be to choose the aim points to achieve maximum effect against core C4I nodes and SAM batteries, just enough to enable strike and SEAD/DEAD packages to break through the line, supported by heavy EW and network attacks.
We must also remember that the US has been overly reliant on Tomahawks for domestic political reasons, in Syria for example, to avoid getting too involved in the ME again. But in a full scale war, the gloves truly come off. Cruise Missiles are supposed to be used to strike key high value targets, not to knock out the enemy by themselves, or flatten entire air bases, as the US was trying to do against Syria.
Logistics. The backbone of war is always logistics. We are using Indian sources as our citations (plus that of a Nepalese professor), which state that India does not have the logistical backbone to sustain this conflict.
Granted that we do not empirically know how a full scale war with 21st century kill chains will play out yet; however, the assumption that China has a huge advantage over India is not an unfair assertion. Why? Simply because China has actually been preparing for it, while India has not. (Again, India's own analysts have claimed this.)
With that said, I agree that more discussion needs to be had on the technicalities. Unfortunately, there are so many Indian media fabrications every day that this thread gets distracted.
It was first test fired in 2001. The Brahmos is essentially a 1990s product. Just because it took India until the late 00's to make it operational doesn't mean it's a 21st century product. India takes forever to field anything. It notoriously has the most inefficient procurement pipeline in the world. That's why France refused local production of Rafales, because they knew India would mess it up and then blame France (like the continually do with Russia.)
Last edited:
any source?
He didn't give a source but I count him as one of the level headed Indian military analyze from his previous works, looks to me he was informed by his inside source
- Status