Ladakh Flash Point

Status
Not open for further replies.

Spiritual Warrior

Banned Idiot
Registered Member
Well technically that’s not true... I think Indians always forget that provocation isn’t just physical, considering all the provocation India has made throughout the last 5 years (but India always forget their own action and consider whatever actions as righteous, learning from America no doubt), also it was Indian unilateral action of changing the status quo first, by changing disputed territory into your own by simple declaration.

That’s what India does with its other neighbours simply declare and others have to accept. Diplomatic protest from China didn’t work, so physical action was the next step. The only difference with India’s other neighbours is China was willing to force the issue. There is really no right or wrong in these issues... it’s a matter of perceptive, interests and what countries are willing to do or how far they are willing to go.
Are you calling TIBET Occupied by China, Xinjiang occupied by Han Chinese & Hong Kong Occupied by Chinese as Legally Correct?
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
Are you calling TIBET Occupied by China, Xinjiang occupied by Han Chinese & Hong Kong Occupied by Chinese as Legally Correct?
What the f..are you blathering on about? Xinjiang has been a part of China since the Tang Dynasty, Hong Kong was and is a Chinese territory ceded to the British as a result from the OPIUM war, Tibet was incorporated to China during the Qing Dynasty and was never part of India who wasn't even a unified country until the arrival of British that colonized that region and made it into a unified country. That's even according to your Grand daddy, Winston Churchill. And also YES, China and it's 56 ethnic groups including the majority HAN Chinese do have the legal ownership of these CHINESE LANDS.

If India likes to contest any of those lands then you're beyond a JOKE.
 

NiuBiDaRen

Brigadier
Registered Member
What the f..are you blathering on about? Xinjiang has been a part of China since the Tang Dynasty, Hong Kong was and is a Chinese territory ceded to the British as a result from the OPIUM war, Tibet was incorporated to China during the Qing Dynasty and was never part of India who wasn't even a unified country until the arrival of British that colonized that region and made it into a unified country. That's even according to your Grand daddy, Winston Churchill. And also YES, China and it's 56 ethnic groups including the majority HAN Chinese do have the legal ownership of these CHINESE LANDS.

If India likes to contest any of those lands then you're beyond a JOKE.
I admire your effort, but I usually keep to one liners so I don't get a heart attack from rebutting them.
 

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
What the f..are you blathering on about? Xinjiang has been a part of China since the Tang Dynasty, Hong Kong was and is a Chinese territory ceded to the British as a result from the OPIUM war, Tibet was incorporated to China during the Qing Dynasty and was never part of India who wasn't even a unified country until the arrival of British that colonized that region and made it into a unified country. That's even according to your Grand daddy, Winston Churchill. And also YES, China and it's 56 ethnic groups including the majority HAN Chinese do have the legal ownership of these CHINESE LANDS.

If India likes to contest any of those lands then you're beyond a JOKE.

So are you saying that British India is occupied by India? Liberation of British India? Lol.
 

Spiritual Warrior

Banned Idiot
Registered Member
What the f..are you blathering on about? Xinjiang has been a part of China since the Tang Dynasty, Hong Kong was and is a Chinese territory ceded to the British as a result from the OPIUM war, Tibet was incorporated to China during the Qing Dynasty and was never part of India who wasn't even a unified country until the arrival of British that colonized that region and made it into a unified country. That's even according to your Grand daddy, Winston Churchill. And also YES, China and it's 56 ethnic groups including the majority HAN Chinese do have the legal ownership of these CHINESE LANDS.

If India likes to contest any of those lands then you're beyond a JOKE.
Any views on Nepal plundering Tibet in 17th & 18th century? On how Nepalese Army defeated Chinese Han occupiers in Tibet?
 

Spiritual Warrior

Banned Idiot
Registered Member
So are you saying that British India is occupied by India? Liberation of British India? Lol.
I can understand your limits of vocabulary in pristine english and thence inability to express. Nonetheless, let's refocus on Tibet occupation by Han Chinese you need to read up on How Tibet came under the control of People's Republic of China (PRC) after the Government of Tibet accepted the Seventeen Point Agreement under Chinese pressure in October 1951.

This occurred after attempts by the Tibetan Government to gain international recognition, efforts to modernize its military, negotiations between the Government of Tibet and the PRC, and a military conflict in the Chamdo area of western Kham in October 1950.

The series of events came to be called the "Peaceful (Laughable) Liberation of Tibet" aka Occupation by the Chinese government, and the "Chinese invasion of Tibet" by the Central Tibetan Administration and the Tibetan diaspora.

A lie repeated a hundred times in China's way of life cannot be truth or reality.
 

Spiritual Warrior

Banned Idiot
Registered Member
I can understand your limits of vocabulary in pristine english and thence inability to express. Nonetheless, let's refocus on Tibet occupation by Han Chinese you need to read up on How Tibet came under the control of People's Republic of China (PRC) after the Government of Tibet accepted the Seventeen Point Agreement under Chinese pressure in October 1951.

This occurred after attempts by the Tibetan Government to gain international recognition, efforts to modernize its military, negotiations between the Government of Tibet and the PRC, and a military conflict in the Chamdo area of western Kham in October 1950.

The series of events came to be called the "Peaceful (Laughable) Liberation of Tibet" aka Occupation by the Chinese government, and the "Chinese invasion of Tibet" by the Central Tibetan A
I can understand your limits of vocabulary in pristine english and thence inability to express. Nonetheless, let's refocus on Tibet occupation by Han Chinese you need to read up on How Tibet came under the control of People's Republic of China (PRC) after the Government of Tibet accepted the Seventeen Point Agreement under Chinese pressure in October 1951.

This occurred after attempts by the Tibetan Government to gain international recognition, efforts to modernize its military, negotiations between the Government of Tibet and the PRC, and a military conflict in the Chamdo area of western Kham in October 1950.

The series of events came to be called the "Peaceful (Laughable) Liberation of Tibet" aka Occupation by the Chinese government, and the "Chinese invasion of Tibet" by the Central Tibetan Administration and the Tibetan diaspora.

A lie repeated a hundred times in China's way of life cannot be truth or reality.

dministration and the Tibetan diaspora.

A lie repeated a hundred times in China's way of life cannot be truth or reality.
From a legal standpoint, Tibet has Not lost its statehood. I can understand that law & legal counsel will Not make Common Sense to Few but Lack of Understanding of Subject matter cannot lead to abrasive and uneducated uncivilized behaviour by some aspiring to be global leaders. Though it's another massive discussion on how that leadership is being achieved by stealing, hacking and human massacre of innocent Ughyurs and Tibetan Buddhist temples.

Tibet It is an independent state under illegal occupation.

Neither China's military invasion nor the continuing occupation by the PLA has transferred the sovereignty of Tibet to China. Period. Please use Google to translate to your language of choice before responding with logic and reasoning.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top