Let's call bets on how long before this thread gets closed and the guy gets banned.
Wonder how he feels having to speak and write in a language forced upon him by the British Empire. A language that isn't native to India LOL!Must have hit a nerve saying that British India should be given back to Great Britain.
Buddy, heard of Rishi Sunak... Incase you can access Google then would know.Must have hit a nerve saying that British India should be given back to Great Britain.
Rishi Sunak, Goenka, Ratan Tata are India's response to Brits occupation of India. Anyways the culture society of Indians & Brits are working together
Oh common, don't you want to discuss... Tibet?Let's call bets on how long before this thread gets closed and the guy gets banned.
I can understand your limits of vocabulary in pristine english and thence inability to express. Nonetheless, let's refocus on Tibet occupation by Han Chinese you need to read up on How Tibet came under the control of People's Republic of China (PRC) after the Government of Tibet accepted the Seventeen Point Agreement under Chinese pressure in October 1951.
This occurred after attempts by the Tibetan Government to gain international recognition, efforts to modernize its military, negotiations between the Government of Tibet and the PRC, and a military conflict in the Chamdo area of western Kham in October 1950.
The series of events came to be called the "Peaceful (Laughable) Liberation of Tibet" aka Occupation by the Chinese government, and the "Chinese invasion of Tibet" by the Central Tibetan Administration and the Tibetan diaspora.
A lie repeated a hundred times in China's way of life cannot be truth or reality.
Buddy, for heaven's sake, quote Kate Middleton at least & not great grand mommmy for some Elizabeth ii, yet I forgive you your choice given your age apparently ... That's why it's important that few countries need to have access to Google to stay abreast of current reality and and live life on State/Party Sponsored linksYes yes. We get it. You miss the loving embrace of Queen Elizabeth II.
I am not sure what you are talking about… considering Tibet was part of China under the Qing dynasty… when the Qing fell and ROC became the legal government of China they had every right to claim all territories of Qing… now they weren’t able to do that due to issues at the time but they had the legal right nonetheless thus when PRC assumed the role of the primary government of China inheriting all legal territorial claims of ROC and by extension the Qing. The PRC had every right to reclaim the territory, we can discuss the means by which that happened but they had the right to do so regardless. The same applies to both Xinjiang and Hong Kong. Whether we like it or not is not the point… you only have a problem with it because it is communist government that did the reclaiming.Are you calling TIBET Occupied by China, Xinjiang occupied by Han Chinese & Hong Kong Occupied by Chinese as Legally Correct?
Again the course of event is irrelevant to the discussion in this matter, as you have said yourself they were attempting to gain international recognition, this meaning they were not recognised as a nation/independent state by the majority of the international community at the time but as a wayward territory of China (whichever one we like to talk about) the successor state of the Qing empire and also the successor of all territories of the Qing empire.I can understand your limits of vocabulary in pristine english and thence inability to express. Nonetheless, let's refocus on Tibet occupation by Han Chinese you need to read up on How Tibet came under the control of People's Republic of China (PRC) after the Government of Tibet accepted the Seventeen Point Agreement under Chinese pressure in October 1951.
This occurred after attempts by the Tibetan Government to gain international recognition, efforts to modernize its military, negotiations between the Government of Tibet and the PRC, and a military conflict in the Chamdo area of western Kham in October 1950.
The series of events came to be called the "Peaceful (Laughable) Liberation of Tibet" aka Occupation by the Chinese government, and the "Chinese invasion of Tibet" by the Central Tibetan Administration and the Tibetan diaspora.
A lie repeated a hundred times in China's way of life cannot be truth or reality.
Oh common, don't you want to discuss... Tibet?
Ughyurs?
Low social credit score? Consequences for your children?
Blacklist of citizens?
Monitoring of your who Country by surveillance?
Any views on it?
Have the ability to discuss & and escape.
So from legal ownership of Chinese lands to segwaying into Chinese battlefield defeats? So you can't rebuttal factual replies you resort into nonsensical non sequitur LOL. Look, your supposed country was so meek, weak, and fragile that it couldn't even muster to resist a British invasion able to swallow the entire Indian territory so thoroughly without even breaking a sweat. Pathetic. As for skirmishes and battles the Chinese has been kicking Indians butt from the ancient times to now. The Tang Dynasty had a brief battle against Indian King and the Chinese whooped Indian butt so hard it wasn't even a sweat. India tried to intimidate Mao's China only to be severely humiliated in 1962 War. You again thought you are on the Chinese level and decided to make provocative moves in Ladakh resulting in the unfortunate deaths on both sides with more deaths and wounded, along with captured soldiers on the Indian side plus officers.Any views on Nepal plundering Tibet in 17th & 18th century? On how Nepalese Army defeated Chinese Han occupiers in Tibet?