J/H-7A night assault training, JiNan MA, 30, Mar. 2015
Interesting that the new KG-600 ECM-pod becomes a bit more common !
Deino
J/H-7A night assault training, JiNan MA, 30, Mar. 2015
Not one thing, except, maybe, that it's not being exported to Argentina?(...)What is not to like about this aircraft.(...)
Why would there be greater political fallout selling JH-7 than JF-17?Yeah, I think China is sensitive enough to the political fallout that they would not consider it.
JH-7A is a bomb truck, and JF-17 is a light fighter. Between the two, you decide what the UK rather China not sell to Argentina.Why would there be greater political fallout selling JH-7 than JF-17?
Well, the bomb truck probably won't make it anywhere against a credible air force defending an area. A light fighter has a better chance to take down a small air force. If the UK has 4-8 Typhoons guarding the Falklands, you'd be better off with 24 JF-17 than 14 JH-7. JF-17 can still do lighter bombing roles while you can't really configure JH-7 to do air superiority.JH-7A is a bomb truck, and JF-17 is a light fighter. Between the two, you decide what the UK rather China not sell to Argentina.
JH-7A is considered more of an offensive weapon. On top of that, it was using Spey engine before.Well, the bomb truck probably won't make it anywhere against a credible air force defending an area. A light fighter has a better chance to take down a small air force. If the UK has 4-8 Typhoons guarding the Falklands, you'd be better off with 24 JF-17 than 14 JH-7. JF-17 can still do lighter bombing roles while you can't really configure JH-7 to do air superiority.
Well, the bomb truck probably won't make it anywhere against a credible air force defending an area. A light fighter has a better chance to take down a small air force. If the UK has 4-8 Typhoons guarding the Falklands, you'd be better off with 24 JF-17 than 14 JH-7. JF-17 can still do lighter bombing roles while you can't really configure JH-7 to do air superiority.
Yeap, I forgot about anti-ship capabilities. JH-7 is very useful, but I still think if Argentina could only have 1, they should try to use the JF-17 to try to outnumber and take down the Typhoons. If you can't get them out of the way, forget about sending heavily-laden JH-7 to do anything.True but the JH-7 can carry more anti-shipping missiles than the one carried by the Super Etendard. Additionally, the JH-7 has an incredible range, which used in conjunction with in-flight refueling would be able to attack vessels from almost any point on the compass. This places vessels in more danger and requires the defending picket vessels to protect a perimeter as opposed to one side, thereby requiring more assets in defense.
Back to bottling my Grenache
But in any case we'll never know, because Argentina has no interest in acquiring the capabilities required to take the Falklands by force.