JH-7/JH-7A/JH-7B Thread

Miragedriver

Brigadier
Do you think we’ll ever see a carrier based version of the JH-7 as a dedicated strike aircraft or will the J-11 just fill both rolls as the Navy’s primary aircraft?
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Do you think we’ll ever see a carrier based version of the JH-7 as a dedicated strike aircraft or will the J-11 just fill both rolls as the Navy’s primary aircraft?
I think you mean the J-15.

The J-15 will fill both roles, probably a two seat version for the strike role.

I also believe that the PLAN will ultimately develop a dedicated two seat EW version similar to the US Navy's E/A-18G Growler.
 

Miragedriver

Brigadier
I think you mean the J-15.

The J-15 will fill both roles, probably a two seat version for the strike role.

I also believe that the PLAN will ultimately develop a dedicated two seat EW version similar to the US Navy's E/A-18G Growler.

Thank you Jeff. Yes the J-15. I figured as much, since it is a very capable aircraft and carrier operational. I would take some serious landing gear and structural modifications to operate the jh-7 from a carrier.
 

shen

Senior Member
Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread

What an excellent strike aircraft. I can imagine the destruction a regiment of these aircraft can do with two or three Anti-shipping missiles and drop tanks for extended range. They could attack a task force of vessels from almost any point on the compass.

Considering the great damages Argentine pilots were able to inflict on the RN with A-4s and Super Etendards during the Falkland War, I can only imaging what you guys can do with a more powerful strike aircraft like the JH-7s.
BTW, can you give us an idea how much Argentine pilots trained during the Falkland War era? like how many hours per year of flying they did back then?
 
Last edited:

Lion

Senior Member
Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread

Considering the great damages Argentine pilots were able to inflict on the RN with A-4s and Super Etendards during the Falkland War, I can only imaging what you guys can do with a more powerful strike aircraft like the JH-7s.
BTW, can you give us an idea how much Argentine pilots trained during the Falkland War era? like how many hours per year of flying they did back then?

But you have to consider the amount of anti warship system has developed over the years. During gulf war I, all anti warship missile fired at allied warship by Iraq were shot down by CWIS or divert away by decoy chaff.

CWIS was absent from Royal Navy during Falkland war. I think it will take a saturation missile attack just to sink a Royal Navy Type 45 destroyer.
 

Miragedriver

Brigadier
Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread

Considering the great damages Argentine pilots were able to inflict on the RN with A-4s and Super Etendards during the Falkland War, I can only imaging what you guys can do with a more powerful strike aircraft like the JH-7s.
BTW, can you give us an idea how much Argentine pilots trained during the Falkland War era? like how many hours per year of flying they did back then?

I would love to see the Naval Aviation with a squadron of JH-7s. However, that will never happen. I don't know how many hours the air force was flying back then, since my relative in the navy department mentioned that the A-4Q sqadron was fly between 180 and 200 hours per year. I imagine the air force was flying more. The older A-4s where very easy the maintain and where loved by the pilots as a very fun and forgiving aircraft to fly.

The flight hours of the air force and naval aviation must be almost non-existent now. Since there is no money even for maintenace. So sad......
 

shen

Senior Member
Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread

I would love to see the Naval Aviation with a squadron of JH-7s. However, that will never happen. I don't know how many hours the air force was flying back then, since my relative in the navy department mentioned that the A-4Q sqadron was fly between 180 and 200 hours per year. I imagine the air force was flying more. The older A-4s where very easy the maintain and where loved by the pilots as a very fun and forgiving aircraft to fly.

The flight hours of the air force and naval aviation must be almost non-existent now. Since there is no money even for maintenace. So sad......

Thank you for sharing the information. 180 and 200 hours per year is actually not a lot by international standard. But it was obviously enough for them to inflict such damage. The courage of those Argentine pilots undoubtedly also played a big role. Don't be sad my friend, things will get better.
 
Top