SteelBird said:I have an idea, dunno whether it is feasible: what if they use a pair of RD-93 or a single AL-31 series on FC-1? Is that possible? But of course it will raise the unit price of the plane.
i will explain the differences later.Indianfighter said:No. The J-10 is being produced in large quanities because China also needs medium-penetration strike capabilities. The FC-1 shall also be produced in quantities as large as the J-10, because it shall be used for defence of the Chinese mainland, whereas the J-10 will be used to fight F-18s over Taiwan or Su-30 MKIs along the border with India.
As an example, India shall have 190 MKIs + option of 50 for deep-strike capabilities and the L** to replace the 250 MiG-21s for defence of the Indian airspace.
now let me give you an extension. For example on the sale of J-7s to Bangladesh. The market value is $10 million (or at least that's what the Bangladeshis thought) and the J-7s are sold for $5.85 million each. So, everyone thinks that China is loosing out on this, but in reality, China is still turning a profit. On the surface, it's a loosing contract, but behind the scenes, it's not.Pakistan will get half the profit, but if China gives subsidies to nations then Pakistan is not obliged to cover half of China's subsidy. China's subsidies are its internal matter; if it wants to sell at a reduced price then it can do so--but without forcing Pakistan to do so. Pakistan can only be persuaded diplomatically.
it is modified on an existing Chinese design, you do realize that right? It can be argued that China has more claim for royalties over al-khalid than Pakistan has over JF-17 since.No. China and Ukraine were paid the development costs by Pakistan. So further sales of the Al-Khalid shall be credited to Pakistan only.
too many advantages from J-10 over FC-1:I admit that I too do not understand the difference between the J-10 and JF-17.
Both are nearly the same size as an F-16. Members of Pakdef posted a news report according to which a Pakistani delegation is in the UK to negotiate the sale of advanced avionics and possibly the selex AESA radar.
If they manage to get that, it is likely that the FC-1 is likely to surpass the avionics of the J-10, as J-10 still doesnt have AESA radar and it is unlikely that UK avionics shall be inferior in anyway to the avionics of the J-10.
The only drawback of the FC-1 is that its weapons load is 3,600 kg as compared to the 4500 kg "useful load" of the J-10.
The J-10, I believe does not deserve the artificial secrecy convened to it by China at all. Maybe some Sun-Tzu philosophy says so or more practically, it has developed an aircraft with less weapons load (FC-1) to export while keeping one with more weapons load for itself and Pakistan. Otherwise prospective buyers might pressurize China to sell the J-10 instead and so its money invested on the Super-7 (and later the FC-1) may all go waste.
Rest assured, I believe that that the J-10 is a 4.5 generation fighter (between Block 52 and Block 60 F-16), but nothing that nations like Taiwan, USA, Japan or India dont have a match against.
Gollevainen said:No my son, Thrust isent a MINOR factor considering the moderns jet fighters, its the essential. Thrust is the factor that determs all the performance of the fighter, its playload (and there by the range and operational flexibility), speed, turnrates, climing...all...Making of these small jets like FC-1, Griben, LCA and similar unbuild concepts like the MiG-33, FX, Novi Avion is due the fact that relatively high trust engines mented to use in paired in bigger planes...M88, RD33, spey and offcourse the F404 are in the markets....They wont offer similar performance that bigger F-100/M-53 caliper engines does, but still enough that packed whit lates avionics and computers these birds comes handy to smaller air forces that seek bargain....No 'big' nation whit advanced aviation industry has build them, as the cost benefits arent that major compared to producing high caliber fighters. But nations whit young aviation industry (india, Spain, yugoslavia) or tigth budget (sweden) have chosen them as they are far better to start whit than producing bigger and more sophisticated planes...and still, majority of these projects have died or hang in near of extincion....
So JF-17 is good export item, but there is certainly no idea of making it an operational plane in PLAAF. China allready has the J-10 coming up and good licence bargain whit another 'mature' fighter, Su-27 and pursuing whit them is the ritgh path for china. If there is a change to do it rigth, its absolute maddness for china to revial the policy of producing and manufacturing of obsolete machine's like it has done in the past.
Black jack said:Indian fighter pretty much took the words right out of my mouth.
TP, You can write and assume all you like and we can carry on going around in circles because most of the stuff you come out with is not concrete because theres alot of secrecy. As i said before you argue your assumptions as though they are fact.
I still think the J-10 is nothing more than an F-16, of a higher block at that. The JF-17 of a lower, but both under F-16. The thing with the J-10 is that it has good potential to pull away from the whole "F-16" thing, which i'm sure we will see in the near future...but you talk as though it's already king of the skies and has reached its peak, It is yet to mature and evolve. There's no doubt it's China's top plane, but every plane has its role, be it a J-10/11 with a deeper strike role or a JF-17 at point defence.
Also, just bcause they're producing alot of J-10's doesn't mean it will replace all the older J's, that's not enough good reason. It's blatently obvious that they're are going to have a large number of J-10's.
It seems you just have a one set mind. We can keep going around in circles, but best thing to do is wait for something official...rather then rumours/assumptions etc. Peace :china:
FYI I'm not Pakistani by the way...Keep that in mind when/if you reply. So you know i'm not trying to be all chummy in terms of Pakistan and China joint freindship production blah blah. I couldn't care less...I'm just using logic with what i know regarding the JF-17 production issue. I just think you have a chip on your shoulder with regard to how magnificent China and J-10 are/is...you over estimate both. Patriotism is good, but it can blind you.
Pakistan may order more Chinese jet fighters
Posted on: May. 11th, 2006 ||
[May. 11th, 2006 - Pakistan may order more Chinese jet fighters] THE Pakistan Air Force says its current order of 150 China-developed FC-1 jet fighters is not enough, Air Marshal Tanvir Mehmood Ahmed, chief of the air crew for the Pakistan Air Force, said yesterday at an official FC-1 flight ceremony in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, the Oriental Morning Post reported.
The fourth prototype of the FC-1, still unpainted and wearing the insignia of the China Aviation Industry Corporation I (CAIC-I), flew for 11 minutes yesterday and displayed its excellent maneuverability to Marshal Ahmed and a Pakistani delegation of 10, the report said.
Invested by CAIC-I and the Pakistani Air Force, the FC-1 is a single-seat, single-engine, multi-role fighter aircraft featuring an entirely self-developed design by China. The fighter has been officially dubbed as "Xiaolong," literally translates to "Fierce Dragon."
skyhawk2005 said:If China were going to purchase JF17/FC1 for it's own Airforce, don't you think it would be announced already?
But it has not been announced. All we have heard is Pakistan telling China to buy it. We have not heard an answer from China.
We do know that the FC1 was meant as an export plane only.
Nobody is saying China will replace J7 with J10 on 1:1 basis. Do you know how many J7's China has? But there should be no doubt that J10 will be the main fighter for China. They will produce these by the 1000s.
It is YOU who are making assumptions that China will purchase JF17s. Too many people make assumptions that the JF17 will serve as a point defence fighter for China. Why would they need the JF17 for? They already have 1000s of J7s and hundreds of J8 for point defence/interceptor role.
No. The J10 and J11 will be the ONLY planes for China until the JXX is finished.
The JF17/FC1 has no role for China.