Re: JMSDF Akizuki Class DDG (19DD AEGIS-like)
If the 19DDH is meant to protect vessels like the Hyuga and the Atago from mid-range air to surface attacks, I believe it will fulfill that role as well as, if not better than the other vessels mentioned.
If it is to defend those same vessels against submarine threats, I believe the same is the case.
Take it out of its role and go to long range air defense, or to land attack, and the others, which were designed to do those tasks will fair better.
I believe in the anti-surface role "ship to ship" they are going to be about even. They will have the same numbers of anti-ship weapons, coming in as sea skimmers, so their mid range and short range defenses are really what will be effective, and they are, or can be, similarly armed there, except the 19DDH has two Phalanx 20mm CIWS.
Anyhow...we have certainly beat it to death, LOL! The new Hobarts are going to be very effective at what they do. Same is true currently for the Bazans. The Akizuki, though designed for a different role (with some overlap as we have discussed), will also be effective in their roles.
I do wish the JMSDF would build larger numbers of their classes like they did with the Murasame. Though, in reality, I have to say, the Murasami, Takanami, and Akizuki could all be called Murasami, Murasmi II and Murasami III in reality because they took the same basic hull and have tweked them a little better each time. What you really have are 18 Mursami and improved Murasami vessels.
Competitive though, how?If a product can fulfill its missions required for it, then it is effective, agreed.
However, one must also consider the capability of similarly sized products to determine whether it is "competitive," a purely academic view.
If the 19DDH is meant to protect vessels like the Hyuga and the Atago from mid-range air to surface attacks, I believe it will fulfill that role as well as, if not better than the other vessels mentioned.
If it is to defend those same vessels against submarine threats, I believe the same is the case.
Take it out of its role and go to long range air defense, or to land attack, and the others, which were designed to do those tasks will fair better.
I believe in the anti-surface role "ship to ship" they are going to be about even. They will have the same numbers of anti-ship weapons, coming in as sea skimmers, so their mid range and short range defenses are really what will be effective, and they are, or can be, similarly armed there, except the 19DDH has two Phalanx 20mm CIWS.
Anyhow...we have certainly beat it to death, LOL! The new Hobarts are going to be very effective at what they do. Same is true currently for the Bazans. The Akizuki, though designed for a different role (with some overlap as we have discussed), will also be effective in their roles.
I do wish the JMSDF would build larger numbers of their classes like they did with the Murasame. Though, in reality, I have to say, the Murasami, Takanami, and Akizuki could all be called Murasami, Murasmi II and Murasami III in reality because they took the same basic hull and have tweked them a little better each time. What you really have are 18 Mursami and improved Murasami vessels.