The US already has bases throughout the home islands e.g. Yokosuka, Sasebo, Misawa etc. etc. and as much access as it deems required under the Anpo treaty.DoD 2+2 joint statement out:
I surmised the CSIS wargame was designed to sell JP increased access to US hardware was timed with 2+2. Access to whole of JP including main islands not just south islands where assets would be even less survivable. IMO JP will have to give something to US pressure eventually, and if only expanding to limited to southern region good indicator JP still not full retard enough to open main island to PRC strikes. As preannounced, currently based 12th Marine on Okinawa will be reorganized into MLR for 2025. From what gather, still limited to ~2,000 troops. Access to JP main islands and Palawan in PH seems integral to US war planning / PRC containment, signs of resistance to open these regions up for US deployment, even if concession given else, is indicator of PRC advantage and as good it can get under current geopolitical climate.
US is currently _limited_ to access to select bases on home islands. By "increased" access to all of JP, I mean they want access to every civilian airfiend for survivable / dispersed deployment per Agile Combat Support.The US already has bases throughout the home islands e.g. Yokosuka, Sasebo, Misawa etc. etc. and as much access as it deems required under the Anpo treaty.
Agile Combat Support is an Air Force-centric programme. If they want survivability for their forces and assets across the branches esp. the Navy via joint commands/facilities, they gonna need more than ACS to make their case.US is currently _limited_ to access to select bases on home islands. By "increased" access to all of JP, I mean they want access to every civilian airfiend for survivable / dispersed deployment per Agile Combat Support.
Agile Combat Support is an Air Force-centric programme. If they want survivability for their forces and assets across the branches esp. the Navy via joint commands/facilities, they gonna need more than ACS to make their case.
What makes you think we're disagreeing? The US' intention for joint use of JP assets and bases in that statement is pretty transparent.I don't see where we're disagreeing, US wants increased access across the board, with ACE being one example, army + marines wants more missiles in theatre, and IMO both more important to increased naval access. USN not going to be resupplying in JP in event of war. Issue is the, the case for increasing access / hardware deployment in main islands is same case for openning these islands to PRC attack. Everyone knows this, and I don't see a better narrative to get JP to buy in other than to prevent TW war via deterrence coming out from US admins in the past few years. Their case is to make JP whole of main islands a front line, and JPs response so far has been, how about these southern islands.