Re: J-xx
Are you intentionally daft? The point is not that the US military-industrial complex lacks information about the J-XX; it's that the Chinese complex has much better access to information about JSF capabilities than you ever will. Instead of addressing the fact that you made a critical flaw in your analysis, you divert it to an irrelevant topic. The reality is that your idea that PLA analysts and engineers have no ideas about JSF capabilities because it's "classified" is naive.
Again, you miss the point. The idea is that me telling you the exact chemical makeup of a polymer or composite does not necessitate you can instantly integrate it into a weapon system. I could tell you the manufacturing process and it would still take time to provide infrastructure capable of producing the required material in production quantities. Rather than trying to rehash or redirect already stated facts, it would be more productive to add either constructive criticism or some other sort of value to the discussion.
In exactly the same way, the US military industrial complex would also have as much access and depth of knowledge of the J-XX, because secrecy or access to the other side thereof, in this case atleast is not a unilateral effort and privilege.
Are you intentionally daft? The point is not that the US military-industrial complex lacks information about the J-XX; it's that the Chinese complex has much better access to information about JSF capabilities than you ever will. Instead of addressing the fact that you made a critical flaw in your analysis, you divert it to an irrelevant topic. The reality is that your idea that PLA analysts and engineers have no ideas about JSF capabilities because it's "classified" is naive.
When you mention "knowing the science behind it", and taking into account the context of espionage at the basest level, it invariably involves the technology to manufacture the desired component(s). Examples are manufacture of AESA radars' gallium arsenide, machinery to integrate all the components, source codes, etc.
Again, you miss the point. The idea is that me telling you the exact chemical makeup of a polymer or composite does not necessitate you can instantly integrate it into a weapon system. I could tell you the manufacturing process and it would still take time to provide infrastructure capable of producing the required material in production quantities. Rather than trying to rehash or redirect already stated facts, it would be more productive to add either constructive criticism or some other sort of value to the discussion.