J-35A fighter (PLAAF) + FC-31 thread

doggydogdo

Junior Member
Registered Member
I am quite surprised by this one. Still not sure why we really need to have a PLAAF version of J-35A.

The best reasoning I can come up with are:
1) Supports industrial base with Shenyang AC and keep cost down for both air force and navy
2) Helps provide support for medium sized aeroengine that would both both J-35A and UCAVs
3) Helps with export when your own air force is also buying it.
I believe it's for ramping up production for future carriers. It's probably not worth it just to make an entirely new production line just for 3 carriers China has right now but who knows how many carriers China is going to build in the future.
 

9615

New Member
Registered Member
I guess:

In early 2010s, Chinese Air Force planned for possible options for their future cost-friendly fleet, which are J11D/J16 (domestic produced Su27/Su30 with upgraded radar). The two were compared and J16 was prefered.

FC31 was a third option, but the Air Force didn't like it then, for whatever reasons (too costly or too little payload or else). The Navy found this to be a potential option for their stealth fighter for carrier, and then invested. The name J35 was given at some point after the Navy wanted it. Upto here it sounds like the story of YF17-F18.

Then, at some point, the Air Force reviewed propotypes of J35 and realized it outperformed J16. The latter just can't detect J35 in a combat, while the price tag of J35 looks reasonable. The Air Force want to have their version as well, and there comes the J35A.
 

Index

Senior Member
Registered Member
I can't believe they really did name the Air Force variant the J-35A. They're practically inviting accusations of copying the F-35A. At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if the naval variant was called the J-35C.
I guess it follows a similar logic as F-15 based on countering Mig-25. Those 2 also bear some superficial resemblance.

I think the naming is very much on purpose, this one is meant to be a direct counterpart to F-35, while J-20 is more of a luxury overmatch weapon.
I am quite surprised by this one. Still not sure why we really need to have a PLAAF version of J-35A.

The best reasoning I can come up with are:
1) Supports industrial base with Shenyang AC and keep cost down for both air force and navy
2) Helps provide support for medium sized aeroengine that would both both J-35A and UCAVs
3) Helps with export when your own air force is also buying it.
On the contrary, I've been hoping for Shenyang's lines to assist with 5th gen for a long time. The arrival of J-35 is earlier than I dared to hope, but absolutely vital to counter a threat environment characterised by a sharp rise in foreign revanchism. China must not permit itself to fall behind on the quantity game.
 

Gloire_bb

Captain
Registered Member
I guess:

In early 2010s, Chinese Air Force planned for possible options for their future cost-friendly fleet, which are J11D/J16 (domestic produced Su27/Su30 with upgraded radar). The two were compared and J16 was prefered.
Flankers can't be cost-friendly by default, it's one of the most expensive platforms per hour out there.

J-35, on the other hand, can and should be cheaper than J-20A. It also can have better LO properties.
 

Alfa_Particle

Junior Member
Registered Member
So how do we define the status of the 35A currently? It doesn't count as LRIP right? So technically still in the prototyping stage or what?
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
It's glorious to see the rush of cope coming in from western social media :D

That's just an appetizer experience.

The main dish will be served once the J-XD technology demonstrator/prototype takes to the skies - Especially (a big) IF that happens before the NGAD. ;)
 
Top