J-35A fighter (PLAAF) + FC-31 thread

by78

General
Full-resolution (5246 x 2951). Pardon the image size, but it's worth it this one time. Note the retractable Luneburg lens.

54118536355_b6f01f9314_o.jpg
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
I don't see an EODAS window on the front between the canopy and the radome like the J-20. Curious.

There's no obvious side nose EO-PDS window either (possibly one which exists but is grey). Also the chin EO-IRST system looks like it is a mockup (possibly has a cover on, but size wise it looks like it doesn't have a cover).

I wouldn't be surprised if it is a prototype that doesn't have subsystems.
 

Alfa_Particle

Junior Member
Registered Member
There's no obvious side nose EO-PDS window either (possibly one which exists but is grey). Also the chin EO-IRST system looks like it is a mockup (possibly has a cover on, but size wise it looks like it doesn't have a cover).

I wouldn't be surprised if it is a prototype that doesn't have subsystems.
Which lines up with what I've heard, that this is just one of the earlier prototypes.
 

Arienai

New Member
Registered Member
I am quite surprised by this one. Still not sure why we really need to have a PLAAF version of J-35A.

The best reasoning I can come up with are:
1) Supports industrial base with Shenyang AC and keep cost down for both air force and navy
2) Helps provide support for medium sized aeroengine that would both both J-35A and UCAVs
3) Helps with export when your own air force is also buying it.
I'm pretty sure J35A and J20 would be the 5th gen version of J10 and J11. From what can be collected from the big shrimps words so far, it should be cheaper, easier to produce (as shown by the articles on 3D printing parts and etc) and easier to maintain (not really a surprise as the program was designed to have a carrier version to begin with). I'm just kind of curious what kind of speed they'll be pumping these out, given they are already producing the "heavy weight" J20 at such a high pace.

Tho I've being hating on the name since the rumors came out several years ago (what kind of troll would choose this name), I gotta say this is my favorite 5th gen aesthetically so far.
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Are we sure it's a prototype? Simultaneously to the reveal, the PLAAF claimed that the type has entered service.

Where did the PLAAF state it „entered“ service? I think you are reading a bit too much into some social media posts



Which lines up with what I've heard, that this is just one of the earlier prototypes.

But then the question is: how many are already out there?
 
Last edited:

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Are we sure it's a prototype? Simultaneously to the reveal, the PLAAF claimed that the type has entered service.
Where did the PLAAF state it „entered“ service? I think you are reading a bit too much into some social media posts

But then the question is: how many are already out there?

Addendum - I believe this may have been a mistake on my part (particularly, the very 2nd post of this thread):

Cross-posted from the Zhuhai Expo 2024 thread.

The official Weibo account of the PLAAF has officially confirmed the service entry of the J-35A with the PLAAF.

View attachment 138337

The actual, more accurate information that we should get out of this PLAAF post on Weibo are that:
1. The existence of J-35A is confirmed, and
2. The J-35A definitely will enter service with the PLAAF (apart from the J-35(B?) for the PLAN).

Regarding the question of "Whether the J-35A has actually entered service with the PLAAF or not?", I don't think we have a definite answer for that at the moment.

Although, rumors from the grapewine suggest that the J-35A will enter service one year after its carrier-based sibling.
 
Last edited:
Top