J-35A fighter (PLAAF) + FC-31 thread

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
I am quite surprised by this one. Still not sure why we really need to have a PLAAF version of J-35A.

The best reasoning I can come up with are:
1) Supports industrial base with Shenyang AC and keep cost down for both air force and navy
2) Helps provide support for medium sized aeroengine that would both both J-35A and UCAVs
3) Helps with export when your own air force is also buying it.
 

KampfAlwin

Senior Member
Registered Member
Does anyone know why the vertical stabilisers on the J-35A is different to the naval one? Wouldn't be easier to just reuse the same stabs for logistics reasons?
 
Last edited:

THX 1138

Junior Member
Registered Member
I can't believe they really did name the Air Force variant the J-35A. They're practically inviting accusations of copying the F-35A. At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if the naval variant was called the J-35C.

And speaking of names, I think it may be time to change the name of this thread. Or perhaps even start a new thread with the new title.
 

Miyayaya

Junior Member
Registered Member
I can't believe they really did name the Air Force variant the J-35A. They're practically inviting accusations of copying the F-35A. At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if the naval variant was called the J-35C.

And speaking of names, I think it may be time to change the name of this thread. Or perhaps even start a new thread with the new title.

For certain export customers who won't get the F35 anyway, maybe a "F35 copy" is a plus, not a minus.
 

aqh

Junior Member
Registered Member
I am quite surprised by this one. Still not sure why we really need to have a PLAAF version of J-35A.

The best reasoning I can come up with are:
1) Supports industrial base with Shenyang AC and keep cost down for both air force and navy
2) Helps provide support for medium sized aeroengine that would both both J-35A and UCAVs
3) Helps with export when your own air force is also buying it.
A land version of the J-31/5 can be what the F35 is to the F22. Namely, something smaller, single engine and cheaper. With economies of scale if the PLA decides to scale they may be getting a lot of these planes for relatively cheap prices, If this plane is only limited to the navy, its unit costs might be too high.
 

yungho

Junior Member
Registered Member
I can't believe they really did name the Air Force variant the J-35A. They're practically inviting accusations of copying the F-35A. At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if the naval variant was called the J-35C.

And speaking of names, I think it may be time to change the name of this thread. Or perhaps even start a new thread with the new title.
Really wish they went with the J-21/J-25 designations to follow the J-11/J-16 designations for the flanker family. Would've fit perfectly with the J-20 and J-10 parallels.
 
Top