It is cost, not size which determines whether an aircraft is high or low.
Yes but if an aircraft is as big as we think then there's little way it can be considered "low" in the traditional sense.
It is cost, not size which determines whether an aircraft is high or low.
Lol, must be pretty confusing for those who are not aware of the 2 different naming conventions. We're talking about China new generation fighter over here in this thread. So it's safe to assume that over here:
4th Gen = Chinese 4th Gen which is equivalent to Western 5th Gen
5th Gen = Western 5th Gen which is equivalent to Chinese 4th Gen
Yes but if an aircraft is as big as we think then there's little way it can be considered "low" in the traditional sense.
That's completely misunderstood. The class category PLAAF is using is Western, which is the fourth generation. The Russians are the only ones that use five generation class system. The situation is more like Chinese Vs Russian, instead of Chinese Vs West.
A photo from the blog of peishens, a big shrimp from CJDBY who was recently exposed as a military journalist working for Global Times and the South China Weekend. Some of his articles were also published on the People's Daily:
Not sure someone drew this after the fact.
Looks like an artistic drawing and nothing like a technical one, so this pictures adds very little extra validity to the original drawing.