J-20... The New Generation Fighter III

Status
Not open for further replies.

Centrist

Junior Member
This is Shenyang's own project. If the air force becomes interested, the plane would be the low end of the high-low mix.

Ah, that might make some sense. Maybe their is a competition going on between Chengdu and SAC over am F-35 Low fighter equivalent. Huitong says that Chengdu is working on the J-21, perhaps SACs competing design is J-19?

IDK, seems like an awefully big fighter to be considered the "low" fighter in the mix.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Ah, that might make some sense. Maybe their is a competition going on between Chengdu and SAC over am F-35 Low fighter equivalent. Huitong says that Chengdu is working on the J-21, perhaps SACs competing design is J-19?

IDK, seems like an awefully big fighter to be considered the "low" fighter in the mix.

I don't think it is fair calling it the "LO" of the mix. It is true that the SAC fighter is probably cheaper and less innovative than the J-20 but its role is different. From what I've read so far the general consensus is that the SAC Fifth gen. will be more of a multi-role platform focusing on surface targets.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Maybe it could potentially be a J-15 follow on?

If the plane's really as big as it is in the photo I think the only real way it can be considered "low" is if it's more of a striker than air dominance.

I don't think it is fair calling it the "LO" of the mix. It is true that the SAC fighter is probably cheaper and less innovative than the J-20 but its role is different. From what I've read so far the general consensus is that the SAC Fifth gen. will be more of a multi-role platform focusing on surface targets.

Oh well that's great -- I was hoping they might eventually build a strike-J-20 but a dedicated striker's good too :)
But if its weapon bay is like the F-22/J-20 I can't imagine it can hold very potent AG weapons.
 

Centrist

Junior Member
Still doesn't make much sense. I don't know. We already have the JH-7B and J-16 for the strike fighter role. There is no need to develop two aircraft for the same role, let alone three.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Still doesn't make much sense. I don't know. We already have the JH-7B and J-16 for the strike fighter role. There is no need to develop two aircraft for the same role, let alone three.

The SAC stealth striker will have all aspect stealth. We are talking about generation gap here.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
The SAC stealth striker will have all aspect stealth. We are talking about generation gap here.

Well a 5th gen striker in the heavy weight class (as opposed to F-35's medium) will definitely be welcome. Hopefully its weapon bays are big enough to accomodate powered weapons.

Still doesn't make much sense. I don't know. We already have the JH-7B and J-16 for the strike fighter role. There is no need to develop two aircraft for the same role, let alone three.

We don't really know how far all these projects are along, but out of SAC's 4th gen, J-16 (the J-11BS striker) and JH-7B, I'd say the first one seems to have most evidence or "chatter" to support it.
 

Player99

Junior Member
I hope nobody today is still confused from time to time with all the 4th vs. 5th gen. talk which can mean the same thing in the same breath... :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top