PS: can anyone confirm WS-15 is done by a XAE/CAC combo and not Shenyang-Liming?
Well everyone has said WS-15 was done by XAE, since however many years ago it was first rumoured to exist.
PS: can anyone confirm WS-15 is done by a XAE/CAC combo and not Shenyang-Liming?
Well everyone has said WS-15 was done by XAE, since however many years ago it was first rumoured to exist.
Can't the J-20 can change pitch without using its canards?
It's interesting because WS15's state secret classification seems to be on the same level as the strategic bomber since the manufacturers are not even allowed to hint anything in any types of news, i.e they can't even mention "new type of engine" in any sort of the public media outlet. No one dares to share the information on public forums neither, much like 2001's progress at Yanliang.
Wait, wait, wait.
I remember reading that part from his paper.
So, what you're saying is, yes it can, but, in some situations, it would use it's canards to change pitch anyway?
I have a feeling that most of the arguments between MiG-29, and others are the fact that MiG often makes very broad sweeping claims without explaining the premises. And in when he does explain, the discussion gets so bogged down in point for point rebuttals that the original topic is lost.
One example being MiG's claim that TVC improves thrust. Can you just explain in a couple sentences the basic idea of how TVC would do that?
To answer your last question first----there is really no way that TVC will increase thrust, it merely deflects exhaust gases to enhance aircraft control----the engineer is correct when he asserts that there is a minimal reduction in thrust as the exhaust gases lose energy when they encounter the deflected nozzle. He is also correct when he points out that TVC increases maintenance and complexity- while it enhances control authority of the aircraft.
In normal flight operations the FCS sytem commands the flight control actuators to "couple the canards and elevons together", the application of aft stick for instance will deflect the canard upward, while the elevons deflect upward to push the tail down,,,,the application of forward stick will deflect the canard downwards and the elevons will also deflect downwards to deflect the tail up,,,,,the canards pulling and the elevons pushing so to speak. Application of slats and flaps will cause the the leading and trailing edge flaps on the main wing to deflect downward to increase lift, in that configuration, the FCS might "prioritize" the pitch control to the canard, it really depends on how the engineers "schedule" the FCS. This is gross oversimplification, and why I have referred to the J-20 as a very "smart" airplane, Dr. Song states that the FCS is quite complex, and many of his innovations occur in the FCS.
let us make another thread and i can post to you that Air force Brat is wrong Thrust vectoring does indeed increase thrust in fact i can prove you with this simple analogy, you can reduce or increase thrust just changing the shape of a nozzle but let us make the new thread i will make it and if you want we discuss this thereThanks, the part about the FCS was very informative.
Regarding the TVC, well, that's what I thought. MiG-29 insists otherwise, and I was curious why.
Can this be moved to a new thread please? Or is there already a TVC thread? I only saw an aerodynamics thread, but it looks like that died.
I wouldn't call it 'solvable' either until it's actually been solved ...........
Great, let me know what you think, he echoes many of your concerns about the powerplants but also has some great insight on the Raptor and talks quite extensively as I recall about the distant coupled canards.
yes F-22 remains the benchmark still, in the case of other jets for two main reasons
F119 still is the top engine.
Russia admits the IR control of 117 is not as efficient as still they would like and remains a problem to tackle
and as long as J-20 has no TVC and supercruise it won`t achieve niether the RCS or speed require to catch up with F-22
F-22 test pilot Paul Metz:
"-All aircraft experience a loss of control effectiveness at supersonic speeds. To generate the same maneuver supersonically as subsonically, the controls must be deflected further. This, in turn, results in a big increase in supersonic trim drag and a subsequent loss in acceleration and turn performance-"
Check the word big increase in supersonic trim drag as J-20 achieves supercruise it requieres the pitch control canards to deflect further than at subsonic speeds so TVC nozzles are required to reduce its RCS and since J-20 is not B-2 haha it reminds me something i read before its RCS will increase as long as it uses canards and any aerodynamic control surface to control the jet.
However once they achieve the engine they will catch up.
So yeah you are right F-22 still is the yardstick in 5th generation aircraft however i would say the lack of IRST and helmet mounted sight is a big flaw in thinking as the recent Eurofighter vs F-22 mock combat has shown