J-20 5th Generation Fighter VII
- Thread starter siegecrossbow
- Start date
- Status
Post from lyman2003
昨天网络上出现了新型歼20的模糊照片，编号2051![[并不简单]](https://face.t.sinajs.cn/t4/appstyle/expression/ext/normal/aa/2018new_bingbujiandan_org.png "[并不简单]")
最大的改变是座舱后隆起，类似歼35座舱的修改。论文中此项修改最大的作用是减少阻力，通过一系列的修改，歼35的阻力能降低10%。有理由相信新型歼20也会应用这些新研究成果。如果未来有俯视图，应该也能看到歼20进气道唇口的修改。
另一项明显的修改是进气道侧面两个冷却液交换口的取消。说明新型歼20电子系统发生了重大改变，要么是热交换需求下降，要么是有更先进高效的散热系统。
机身后部的修改暂时没有清晰照片。有大佬说发动机暂时没变，但未来发动机必定要改成WS15和矢量喷口。发动机和喷口修改一定会修改后机身，我们拭目以待吧![[酷]](https://face.t.sinajs.cn/t4/appstyle/expression/ext/normal/c4/2018new_ku_org.png "[酷]")
中国武器研发走的是小步快跑技术路线，逐步修改和应用新技术。确保新装备上的新技术占比尽量不超过30%，新型歼20和歼20S正是这种技术路线的产物。另一种技术路线就是美国，过于追求一步到位、技术跨越，力求把所有对手甩在身后。
当然这是因为历史上美国成功过尝到过甜头。 F14、F15、F22就是典型的正面例子。但是今天的美国早已不是七八十年代的美国，研发能力和技术水平领先程度都远远落后于那个时代。
美国在NGAD六代机上曾想过走小步快跑路线，也就是类似上世纪50年代的“百式计划”。但是仅过了三年就已放弃，重新走回一步到位，企图再次把中国甩在身后的技术大跨越路线。美国这次是否能成功呢？![[阴险]](https://face.t.sinajs.cn/t4/appstyle/expression/ext/normal/9e/2018new_yinxian_org.png "[阴险]")
I'm happy now. The J-20 seems to become cooler looking with every iteration.
Really? What makes you think that way…?
PS: at first sight it looks impressive but after a second sight and even more some careful comparisons it looks indeed as if again a bored joker wanted to fool us.
I agree now, there are too many differences in important details, which make me think it is unfortunately faked.
Last edited:
Sorry to interupt, but quick question(s) -
Is the J-20"B" designation referring to J-20s that are fitted with:
1. WS-10 only;
2. WS-15 only; or
3. Both WS-10 and WS-15?
(Or any non-engine related changes?)
This is because I have seen people giving those J-20s with Russian engines the designation of J-20"A", so I found that the J-20"B" classification is becoming rather ambigiuous and/or free-flowing at the moment.
Is the J-20"B" designation referring to J-20s that are fitted with:
1. WS-10 only;
2. WS-15 only; or
3. Both WS-10 and WS-15?
(Or any non-engine related changes?)
This is because I have seen people giving those J-20s with Russian engines the designation of J-20"A", so I found that the J-20"B" classification is becoming rather ambigiuous and/or free-flowing at the moment.
I dont think there's any official confirmation
Really? What makes you think that way…?
PS: at first sight it looks impressive but after a second sight and even more some careful comparisons it looks indeed as if again a bored joker wanted to fool us.
I agree now, there are too many differences in important details, which make me think it is unfortunately faked.
View attachment 103845
Unaltered photo.
Source:
That’s the one!
indeed and even more confusion …
given that there is now the early J-20 (AL-31), then the serial J-20A both with AL-31 and later WS-10, so this one should be the J-20B.
however @huitong calls them J-20(I), J-20(II) and J-20(III)
Does the J-10C designation apply only to birds with WS-10 engine? I think that should answer your question.
It's not PS. The photo is flipped. The new J-20 starting from 2031/2032 have different configurations on the left side vs the right side, is my best guessReally? What makes you think that way…?
PS: at first sight it looks impressive but after a second sight and even more some careful comparisons it looks indeed as if again a bored joker wanted to fool us.
I agree now, there are too many differences in important details, which make me think it is unfortunately faked.
View attachment 103845
- Status