Sorry, can you explain the significance of these new numbers, what do they imply?
Sorry, can you explain the significance of these new numbers, what do they imply?
Somehow they are making on average nearly 1 WS-10 engine per day. You have to remember that spares are also bought and produced. Can imagine how many production lines are making WS-10 components to achieve a rate approaching 1 engine per day averaged out throughout a year.
And some internet Indians and Anglos still to this day do not believe China has even made a working F110 class low bypass turbofan. LOL. 12+ years in service f*ckers! On three separate platforms and possibly others.
Also hear some Indians still use the line "China bought Su-35 so J-20 is rubbish". China is building nearly as many J-20s per month as China has purchased Su-35 ... ever... back in the 2010s no less lol.
Shenyang build pulse assembly line. and it took 5 years. so a single unit of engine production time reduced by 2/3. and results are in front of us.
WS-20 production begun too. from 2021 components production scale up by many folds.
Chinese aero engines makers caught up the western engine makers in terms of production.
almost daily i get interact with bunch of Indians and Anglos on twitter. same old shit. ah China can't produce engine. they bought SU-35 to just examine the Russian engines. bla bla bla
these people will never ever accept China has second most powerful country in science and technology.
They have improved a lot and more than many of us have anticipated by this point, but have definitely not caught up to western engine makers. Just thinking about it this way, Airbus and Boeing produce probably close to 120 narrow body per months which would require 240 engines and spares and that is split between just Pratt and cfm. China has come a long way, but let's not get ahead of ourselves.Shenyang build pulse assembly line. and it took 5 years. so a single unit of engine production time reduced by 2/3. and results are in front of us.
WS-20 production begun too. from 2021 components production scale up by many folds.
Chinese aero engines makers caught up the western engine makers in terms of production.
pulse line is a type of moving assembly line, but its one step short of a continues moving line. In a pulse line, products are positioned sequentially in a straight or U-shaped line on the shop floor. The products stay at those positions until all the planned work is complete.What is "pulse assembly line"?
They have improved a lot and more than many of us have anticipated by this point, but have definitely not caught up to western engine makers. Just thinking about it this way, Airbus and Boeing produce probably close to 120 narrow body per months which would require 240 engines and spares and that is split between just Pratt and cfm. China has come a long way, but let's not get ahead of ourselves.
Even when it comes to 5th gen, lockmart is still capable of producing 150 a year. At this point, cac is probably at half of their level although I anticipate cac + sac + guizhou together is probably getting close to 150 a year now.
pulse line is a type of moving assembly line, but its one step short of a continues moving line. In a pulse line, products are positioned sequentially in a straight or U-shaped line on the shop floor. The products stay at those positions until all the planned work is complete.
this concept first introduced by US military industrial complex in early 2000's. you can apply this on any heavy industrial product.
China also started to convert its production line as pulse lines. Y-20 was the first Chinese aircraft to actually produced on pulse assembly line. now all main Chinese military industrial products have pulse assembly line include engines.
like this..
View attachment 101016
sir i m talking about low bypass military turbofan engine production ..They have improved a lot and more than many of us have anticipated by this point, but have definitely not caught up to western engine makers. Just thinking about it this way, Airbus and Boeing produce probably close to 120 narrow body per months which would require 240 engines and spares and that is split between just Pratt and cfm. China has come a long way, but let's not get ahead of ourselves.
Even when it comes to 5th gen, lockmart is still capable of producing 150 a year. At this point, cac is probably at half of their level although I anticipate cac + sac + guizhou together is probably getting close to 150 a year now.
LEAP engines assembly line in Safran plant.. but with collaboration with GEThanks for explanation. Seems like a good direction for adjustments. Surprised even better manufacturing process innovations have not been made. I mean this is already relatively obvious stuff from factory arrangement to equipment that allows this sort of manufacturing ie moving lines. Been used in car making for decades hasn't it?
Now this is a fine factory. Safran? GE or RR or P&W?