lcloo
Captain
I don't know anything about this "general rule", but rationally in peace time it is not neccesary to have one spare engine for every twin engined aircraft, especially the aircraft in question are new aircraft from factory.I think the "general rule"(?) should be 3 engines for every twin-engine fighter, i.e. 2 engines for installation and 1 engine as spare.
So that means 80/90 J-20s should be "accompanied" by 240-270 WS-10Cs.
Of course, if anyone finds the aforementioned "general rule" is inaccurate, feel free to rectify.
Assumed a case that the delivery of J20 is in a batch of 8 aircraft each time. You would not expect all 8 new J20 to develope engine problem within say, 6 months or 1 year. Therefore within this period, you would only need to delivery 2, 3 or may be 4 spare engine to that air brigade.
Therefore for a number like 80 or 90 newly delivered aircraft, a dozen or so spare engines to accompany their deliveries are more than adequate. After completion of these aircraft deliveries, more spare engines can be send to them in small batches the number of which depends on the rate of spare engine replacing the old one.
Therefore I don't think China is following this rule of one spare engine for every twin engined aircraft delivered from factory.
This "general rule" would be changed in war time, or in time similar to the Cold War period between the West and Soviet bloc. In this scenario, damaged engines due to wear and tear or war actions, one spare engine for every aircraft could be necessary.
By the way, CFM is expecting to produce 1,800 Leap series engines this year, or 4.9 engines each calander day. No doubt China's engine making capacity is much lower, but it is not impossible that they produced 1 or 2 engines per day if they invested billions RMB in engine development and manufacturing facilities, which I believe they did.