I would also note that the ruddervators are each deflected inward on the leading edge,, which should lift the aft end and pitch the nose down,, so plenty of lift is obviously being created by the downward flap deflection coupled with the canard making "lift" to pitch the nose up...
It is normal on approach to have to add a little downward deflection in order to keep airspeed from deteriorating, the application of flaps will cause a slight "ballooning" effect on the whole aircraft, resulting in energy loss, and this must be compensated with the very judicial use of some downward pitch.. once you have "stabilized" the approach bringing the throttles back up slightly off idle will also help stabilize the approach.
too much and you get an overspeed, to little and your energy and airspeed begin to deteriorate rapidly,,,, airspeed control on approach is absolutely critical,,, speed brakes do help,, but nothing compensates for lack of good planning, and "letdown" often begins 50 or more nautical miles away from the destination airport.. you want to maximize efficiency in most cases.
Modern fighter aircraft are equipped with an angle of attack indicator,,, which is honestly more accurate than the airspeed indicator,,, but either one will do,, you want to arrive at the threshold and begin your "flare" with just enough energy to allow the aircraft to slow its rate of decent substantially, but not so much airspeed that you "float" down the runway.