J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread IV (Closed to posting)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
But if they actually enlarge it - esp. in all dimensions - by say 20 % so it reaches the level of weight and size of the J-20 ... then it will need larger and more powerfull engines and could therefore no longer be a lower-weight supplement or complement to the heavy one.

IMO not a good option.

Deino
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
But if they actually enlarge it - esp. in all dimensions - by say 20 % so it reaches the level of weight and size of the J-20 ... then it will need larger and more powerfull engines and could therefore no longer be a lower-weight supplement or complement to the heavy one.

IMO not a good option.

Deino

Sounds about the same difference between the hornet and super hornet.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Rumors from the Weibo of CD

1) the development of J-20 is much faster than the case of ... F-22, took around only 1/3 of the time (confirmed by official media)
Uh, actually I do not think that is the case at all.

We do not know how long the development of the J-20 is taking. We do not know exactly when it started, and we certainly do not know when it will produce a production aircraft yet. So we cannot know this.

We do know this about the F-22.

  • 1981 mid-year: US Air Force develops initial ATF requirement, which included composite materials, lightweight alloys, advanced flight-control systems, more powerful propulsion systems, and stealth technology. No designs had started at this point.
  • 1986 Jul: US Air Force puts out a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the ATF.
  • 1986 Oct: Lockheed/Boeing/General Dynamics and Northrop/McDonnell Douglas selected to develop designs for a 50 month demonstration phase to produce and test two flying prototypes each.
  • 1990 Sep: 1st prototype F-22 takes flight, just over four years after design started.
  • 1991 Apr: Lockheed Martin awarded contract for ATF to produce F-22 fighter.
  • 1997 Apr: 1st Production F-22 unveiled at factory in Marietta Georgia, six years after contract awarded
  • 1997 Sep: 1st flight of production F-22.
  • 2003 Jan: 1st production F-22 delivered to US Air Force, five and to-thirds years after first flight.
  • 2005 Dec: F-22 achieves Initial Operational Capability (IOC), 18.9 years after design started, just under three years after initial delivery.
  • 2006 Jun: In combat training debut, at Northern Edge exercises, 12 F-22s of the 94th FS down 108 adversaries with no losses.
  • 2007 Dec: F-22 achieves Full Operational Capability, four years after initial delivery.
  • 2011 Dec: Last of 195 production F-22 produced. 25 years after design started, and jut under nine years after initial delivery.

Which leads to the following time frames regarding the F-22:

- 5.00 years from initial requirement to award of contract
- 4.00 years from initial design to flying prototype.
- 6.00 years from contract award to first production aircraft
- 6.00 years from first production flight to first delivery to US Air i Force
- 3.00 years from first delivery to IOC
- 4.00 years from first delivery to Full Operational Capability.
- 9.00 years from first delivery to final aircraft.

We do not have as much detail on the beginnings of the J-20, but we do know this:

  • 1998 time frame PLAAF develops J-XX requirement.
  • 2006 time frame PLAAF has design competition between Chengdu and Shenyang for Project 718.
  • 2008 PLAAF awards Chengdu the contract to build the J-20.
  • 2010 Dec: 1st Prototype J-20 makes taxi tests and is unveiled to the world.
  • 2011 Jan: 1st prototype J-20 first flight.
  • 2012 May: 2nd prototype makes first flight.
  • 2014 Mar: 3rd Prototype makes first flight.

This is all we know. But matching that up to the miles stones from the F-22 w find:

- 10.00 years from initial requirement to award of contract
- 04.00 years from initial design to flying prototype.

So, in terms of the time from the first requirement to awarding a contract, the J-20 took twice as long as the F-22.

In terms of the time from the award of the contract to the first flight of a prototype, the J-20 and the F-22 took the same amount of time.

Now, if the J-20 makes an initial in service date by 2019 like they are talking about, then it will move ahead of the F-22 time line by several years.

But that hasn't happened yet.

As of right now, they are similar in their production and development schedules. The J-20 is certainly not being done in 1/3 the time by any measure at this point.
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
It might just be the carrier variant of J-31. They probably increased the size to accommodate greater weapons load and fuel capacity.

I think that is a very real possibility, the PLANAF does not seem afraid of the J-15s size, and the Super Hornet shows the USN was not really satisfied with the HORNET and developed the Super Hornet, the PAC pays very close attention to what others have found in order to learn from others progress and not repeat the same mistakes???
 

Skywatcher

Captain
I think that is a very real possibility, the PLANAF does not seem afraid of the J-15s size, and the Super Hornet shows the USN was not really satisfied with the HORNET and developed the Super Hornet, the PAC pays very close attention to what others have found in order to learn from others progress and not repeat the same mistakes???

Would be interesting, with the 20% larger (I assume that's weight) J-31 for the carriers, and the original for the PLAAF.

Incidentally, would a 20% larger J-31 make it closer in size to the F-22?
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Would be interesting, with the 20% larger (I assume that's weight) J-31 for the carriers, and the original for the PLAAF.

Incidentally, would a 20% larger J-31 make it closer in size to the F-22?

Exactly ... And as such it will only be procurred by he PLAN and no longer by the PLAAF. As such cost will rise and another smaller design will be needed to substitute the J-20 as well as acting as a replacement for the J-10.
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
But if they actually enlarge it - esp. in all dimensions - by say 20 % so it reaches the level of weight and size of the J-20 ... then it will need larger and more powerfull engines and could therefore no longer be a lower-weight supplement or complement to the heavy one.

IMO not a good option.

Deino

The PLANAF may have looked at the J-20 and decided that was the "right size" for a front line FAD fighter, and that the J-31 needed to be the J-42 ????? Its hard to say, the Indians on the other hand seem happy with the Mig-29K as a carrier fighter, so it just depends on which way the wind blows ?????? Both you and Siege have good points, so like Jeff says, "we'll have to wait and see?????"
 

AeroEngineer

Junior Member
No it is not, the Russian patent says F-22 has a bigger RCS than the PAKFA, but the Russians based that upon their newer radars, and the fact their jet uses newer types of composites, if you want to believe it or not is just a personal decision, but they say they achieved better RCS thanks to much better nanotechnology coatings and a large surface made of composites and they say F-22 has a larger RCS because they are using L frequency radars.

NIIP-AESA-L-Band-Brochure-2S.jpg


Oh My Dear >>>removed<<<

F-15 is 110% Mig-29!!!!!! He and Mig-29 post in the same format under the same tone and they both bring up Russian JUNKS!!!!

This picture is the proof!!! :p

He is just like the other >>>removed<<< trolls >>>removed<<<. They are immortal trolls !! :mad: Which means that no matter how many times you ban them, they will keep coming back with different accounts.

Thank you mods for banning these idoits !!
:D
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Not sure if recent and not sure if J-20 or 31 (probably 20)

Surely a J-20 ... As such it remains interesting to know how recent it is and if it is 2011 or indeed 2012.:p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top