J-10 Thread IV

by78

General
More images of J-10CE.

51958556998_bc85a37258_o.jpg

51958790569_039789b3b1_o.jpg

51958790629_9e393a311b_o.jpg
 

ChongqingHotPot92

Junior Member
Registered Member
More images of J-10CE.

51958556998_bc85a37258_o.jpg

51958790569_039789b3b1_o.jpg

51958790629_9e393a311b_o.jpg
Ok now maybe I get why the J-10 has a 1000-1200 km combat radius as opposed to the F-16's 550 km combat radius (without conformal or traditional fuel tanks). The J-10 is actually bigger; thus, potentially carrying more internal fuel.

Also, since the J-10C has a bigger radome than both the F-16V and the Rafale, I would assume that the J-10C's AESA contain more T/R receivers (thus, potentially more accurate scanning) than those of both rivals.

Still, I wonder what the J-10C's RCS would be compared to the newest vipers.
 

lych470

Junior Member
Registered Member
Ok now maybe I get why the J-10 has a 1000-1200 km combat radius as opposed to the F-16's 550 km combat radius (without conformal or traditional fuel tanks). The J-10 is actually bigger; thus, potentially carrying more internal fuel.

Also, since the J-10C has a bigger radome than both the F-16V and the Rafale, I would assume that the J-10C's AESA contain more T/R receivers (thus, potentially more accurate scanning) than those of both rivals.

Still, I wonder what the J-10C's RCS would be compared to the newest vipers.

China also has a vast airspace that needs defending. A long combat radius is a baked in requirement for PLAAF procurement at this point, I think.
 

LCR34

Junior Member
Registered Member
Ok now maybe I get why the J-10 has a 1000-1200 km combat radius as opposed to the F-16's 550 km combat radius (without conformal or traditional fuel tanks). The J-10 is actually bigger; thus, potentially carrying more internal fuel.

Also, since the J-10C has a bigger radome than both the F-16V and the Rafale, I would assume that the J-10C's AESA contain more T/R receivers (thus, potentially more accurate scanning) than those of both rivals.

Still, I wonder what the J-10C's RCS would be compared to the newest vipers.
It was speculated that J10C has around 3T internal fuel, while Rafale is advertised to carry 4.7T. J10 looks bigger than rafale too.
 

ChongqingHotPot92

Junior Member
Registered Member
It was speculated that J10C has around 3T internal fuel, while Rafale is advertised to carry 4.7T. J10 looks bigger than rafale too.
Well the J-10C's engine does take up quite a lot of space compared to the Rafale, so I would not be surprise if the Rafale carries more fuel. In fact, it is widely believed that the Rafale has a combat radius of 1700+km, which is greater than those of the Su-27 and nearly matches those of the F-15. However, the single engine on the J-10C is more powerful, and the bigger radome allows for a bigger AESA. The best comparison to the J-10C is the F-16 Viper, but as mentioned earlier, the Viper (also a single powerful turbofan engine like the J-10 as opposed to Rafale's two medium-sized turbofan engines) somehow has a super short combat radius of 550-600 km without conformal fuel tanks.

I would argue that in the case of Pakistan, while India's Rafales surely have longer strike ranges, J-10C's bigger AESA radar gives it an edge in BVR combat.
 
Top