J-10 Thread IV

[Nobonita Barua]

But 70082 makes no sense

Definitely 70082.

 

[Deino]

Definitely 70082.

And what makes you so sure?? IMO once again 78082 or maybe 78582, but IMO unlikely 70082.

 

[Nobonita Barua]

And what makes you so sure?? IMO once again 78082 or maybe 78582, but IMO unlikely 70082.

View attachment 66418

View attachment 66417

Because the difference between 2nd, 3rd with the 4th number is pretty evident. 2nd & 3rd is pretty consistent. It can be either both 0 or both 8. In 4th number the mid-bend is visible too, so most possibly that's 8.
And there is no 5, that's for damn sure.


btw , who is wajiha naqvi of cafe studio?

 

[siegecrossbow]

J-10AH modified to carry PL-10

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Deino]

J-10C 0276 spotted

 

[xyqq]

J-10C 0376 spotted

View attachment 66510

Is it 0276?

 

[Deino]

Is it 0276?

Arrggg ... stupid typo! Thanks

 

[Totoro]

What was the highest batch number we had? And how many batches documented so far?

 

[Deino]

What was the highest batch number we had? And how many batches documented so far?

This is what I have:

Block	First seen	Highest known number	Estimated size of batch 0x
B-01	12.2013	0122; 0154, 0155 are reported as well	56
C-02	01.2016	0275 (10.2018)	76
C-03	10.2018	0339	40
C-04	11.2019	0440	40
C-05	05.2020	0512	??
C-06	11.2020	06xx	??

 

[Deino]

Not sure if from the recent Shaheen IX exercise but anyway it shows how much low-viz the new PLAAF low-visibility markings are.

(Image via Cai Zhai at FB)