Only applies to attacks in North America and Europe
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict and other Related Conflicts in the Middle East (read the rules in the first post)
- Thread starter phrozenflame
- Start date
Oct 7th came and went. Also, seems the IDF hasn't been able to get a proper foot inside Lebanon without getting their teenager Captains sent home in a box to the point Netanyahu is asking the Lebanese to riot against Hezbollah after killing a ton of civilians.
Something tells me you wouldn't apply that logic to the Ukranian war.
Seem some war criminals, namely the israeli sniper team that recorded themselves braging about killing kids and women are starting to feel the heat and are deleting their social networks
Last edited:
Eradicating Hamas wasn't the goal. The goal was to make Gaza unlivable, so that Gazans would leave voluntarily, making annexing easier. Hence the complete destruction of civilian infrastructure.
Bomb civilian homes first, followed by schools and work places. Then take out hospitals so Gazans have no place for treatment. Destroy water works and energy infrastructure, so no running water and lights. Bomb aid services, refugee camps, and anything that Gazans rely on to stay alive. The message to Gazans is clear: LEAVE! You cannot live here. As in, you literally cannot live here anymore. This has been explained by Israeli officials themselves .. "make life so difficult that nobody will want to live in this hell".
Ukrainian aircraft are backed by NATO recon assets operating nearby (especially in Poland, Romania and Black Sea), and who knows, maybe even inside Ukraine. Iran doesn't have any credible aerial recon.
This retrograde logic. You test nukes to create deterrence, not to get nuked or conventionally attacked (like Iraqi reactors). I'm sure Iran knows the time-sensitive urgency of miniaturization of nukes, hence they will likely only do a hard test once they've already developed the miniaturization required to mount the devices on the appropriate carrier vehicles. That means, if they are to conduct a test soon, then they have probably already miniaturized it. Who knows how many cold tests they've performed - those don't show up in seismic monitoring systems anyways.
Also, this idea of Iran and nukes is being perpetuated in the media most notably by Israel and US. Back in June or July, Blinken said on record "Iran is one-two weeks away from producing enough material for nuclear weapons". They are trying their best to start this war, somehow, anyhow.
_______
"We had to take it in small doses"
61% of Israelis think Palestinians don't have a right for self-determination and 90% support the invasion of Lebanon along with 52% think they should destroy the entire infrastructure of Lebanon. 83% think Israel has been highly ethical during the war
Society of sociopaths.
Society of sociopaths.
Was there change in stance?
These type of responses are why I think stopping this war is going to be very difficult. It seems very much like Israel is willing to fight this conflict come hell or high water.
Perhaps a softer more neutral stance with the wording? They aren't wrong, hardliner Israel politicians play on that fear.
That kind of bravado only last as long as the going doesn't get too tough. If the situation last too long to the point where you can't fool yourself into thinking you in for a quick victory, they'll start to bail and make use of their dual citizenship, specially as the services in other areas keep straining by the influx of refugees from other areas of the country.
And there is the whole mental impact since its not just the odd Hamas bottle rocket attack.
Are these Iranians stupid. They are free targets.