Israeli-Palestinian Conflict and other Related Conflicts in the Middle East (read the rules in the first post)

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
So after few hours since iran used BM against Israel what did I learn... Ballistic Missiles suck when it comes to hitting target and doing damage. They tried going after Mossad HQ and it is still standing. You know what is extremely more effective in getting results... aircraft carrying 1000, 2000, 3000 or 5000lbs JDAM or bunker buster. They went after airbases and they weren't even knocked out of operations now it is Israel's turn and we're going to see the difference.

Conventional BM don't cut it.

That sort of generalization is simplistic and flawed.

The effectiveness of any sort of strike system whether it's ballistic missiles or manned strike aircraft entirely depends on the advancement of your munitions, your supporting ISR, EW, BDA, and the advancement and scale of defenses that the adversary can put up.
 

SinoSoldier

Colonel
Iran and US both want to deescalate, not Israel.

Even if their inherent desire is to capitalize on the opportunity to cut the head off the snake, per se, their leadership must've realized by now that the economic and societal implications of an all-out war with Iran + Hezbollah + Hamas might not justify the ends.

We will see how Israel responds.
 

tamsen_ikard

Junior Member
Registered Member
So after few hours since iran used BM against Israel what did I learn... Ballistic Missiles suck when it comes to hitting target and doing damage. They tried going after Mossad HQ and it is still standing. You know what is extremely more effective in getting results... aircraft carrying 1000, 2000, 3000 or 5000lbs JDAM or bunker buster. They went after airbases and they weren't even knocked out of operations now it is Israel's turn and we're going to see the difference.

Conventional BM don't cut it.

The difference is having powerful Air defense. If you have good air defense, then Planes with JDAM will be shot down before they even get to strike. If Hezbollah had Air defense then Israel wouldn't be able to do air strikes with impunity. This is the key difference between powerful countries versus insurgency groups. Houthis, Hamas or Hezbollah none of them have air defense network. Iran on the other hand does have air defense, although its kinda weak and not as good as whatever Russia, China or even Israel has.

Against powerful Air defense, missiles are the only safe and effective option.
 

Kejora

Junior Member
Registered Member
That sort of generalization is simplistic and flawed.

The effectiveness of any sort of strike system whether it's ballistic missiles or manned strike aircraft entirely depends on the advancement of your munitions, your supporting ISR, EW, BDA, and the advancement and scale of defenses that the adversary can put up.
This shows that Iran still lack the ISR capability of Russia and China. In Ukraine, Russia has managed to strike individual buildings and vehicles and even trains with Iskander and Kinzhal.
 
Top