Me too. I didn't see that many interceptions. There are a few in the video but the ones I saw didn't even reach 15 interceptions.I saw a handful interceptions max, not 24, 36 or 48.
Me too. I didn't see that many interceptions. There are a few in the video but the ones I saw didn't even reach 15 interceptions.I saw a handful interceptions max, not 24, 36 or 48.
US provides a lot of the kill chain for Israeli BMD. SBIRS detects the launch of a missile and determine its type and likely destination. That info cues a ground based radar (Green Pine, AN-TPY2) that tracks it, a missile defense interceptor is then launched to kill it.It is not possible to predict the trajectory of a ballistic missile that can alter its flight path
Exactly. That's the point. But contrary to what Israel claims, the IRGC said it only fired 100 missiles. Who are you going to trust? How does that number make your interception assessment? Furthermore, the lack of evidence of many interceptions (which could have occurred) also does not mean that most or all of the missiles penetrated Israel, so the opposite is true.Aren’t you arguing against yourself by claiming those were not unitary warheads? By that logic we can divide the number of hits to arrive at a much lower number of missiles that got through.
In other words, no proof of intercepts.You do realize that Arrow missiles will make intercepts outside the atmosphere? Those are unlikely to have been caught on camera, especially given that Arrow 3 has a range of over 2000km.
I cannot see a good number falling apart. Instead, I see a good number hitting the ground after a fiery re-entry into the atmosphere.What we see on the videos are likely David Sling intercepts. If you pay close attention, you can observe that a good number of the missiles are falling apart as they are descending, having been hit before the camera panned to them.
Amsterdam to Dubai, filmed over Iran, the standard route. And whose fault is that? Carriers are taking the alternate route over KSA-Egypt-Med. I guess the American-Israeli tech isn't THAT reliable to fly through a warzone.The guy that filmed the video claimed they were flying to Dubai:
How is the target being tracked? It has negligible emissions of it's own including the heat signature, the source of which is on the aft end (not facing the tracker and blocked by the body).US provides a lot of the kill chain for Israeli BMD. SBIRS detects the launch of a missile and determine its type and likely destination. That info cues a ground based radar (Green Pine, AN-TPY2) that tracks it, a missile defense interceptor is then launched to kill it.
This system is quite effective (China's HQ-19 and DN-3 uses similar principles). it's just the interceptors are probably 10x the cost of the missiles. You'd be surprised at the ballistic missile production of countries like DPRK and Iran. They sent Russia hundreds of ballistic missiles and have enough to do this.
The fact that I counted no more than 30 impacts tells me that the intercept rate was not too shabby.In other words, no proof of intercepts.
I cannot see a good number falling apart. Instead, I see a good number hitting the ground after a fiery re-entry into the atmosphere.
Amsterdam to Dubai, filmed over Iran, the standard route. And whose fault is that? Carriers are taking the alternate route over KSA-Egypt-Med. I guess the American-Israeli tech isn't THAT reliable to fly through a warzone.
View attachment 136770
It leaves a huge heat plume behind it.How is the target being tracked? It has negligible emissions of it's own including the heat signature, the source of which is on the aft end (not facing the tracker and blocked by the body).
TPY-2 and THAAD are deployed at Nevatim AB since 2019.
Once the motors cuts out it cannot be tracked by IR - detecting the plume is not tracking the bus. It can only be tracked by radar if it rises above the local radar horizon. Russian ICBMs are specifically designed for a very short boost phase to minimize the time that IR satellites can track the motor burn and cue radars.The fact that I counted no more than 30 impacts tells me that the intercept rate was not too shabby.
It leaves a huge heat plume behind it.
AN/TPY-2 can track the missiles from 2000km away. AEGIS BMD radars likewise.
That's only half the equation. How do you know how many missiles were launched? Are you inserting your own figures of launched projectiles to manipulate the intercept rate to your liking?The fact that I counted no more than 30 impacts tells me that the intercept rate was not too shabby.
Heat plume is behind it, not on it. Heat guidance requires an IR-seeker. TPY-2 does not have an IR-seeker. Tracking a target is not the same as locking a target and guiding an interceptor to it.It leaves a huge heat plume behind it.
AN/TPY-2 can track the missiles from 2000km away. AEGIS BMD radars likewise.
It heats up as it travels through the atmosphere at Supersonic, then hypersonic speed. How do you think modern heatseekers work? They can pick up aerodynamic heating.That's only half the equation. How do you know how many missiles were launched? Are you inserting your own figures of launched projectiles to manipulate the intercept rate to your liking?
Heat plume is behind it, not on it. Heat guidance requires an IR-seeker. TPY-2 does not have an IR-seeker. Tracking a target is not the same as locking a target and guiding an interceptor to it.