Israeli-Palestinian Conflict and other Related Conflicts in the Middle East (read the rules in the first post)

D

Deleted member 24525

Guest
Actually, the 2nd source goes into this. Post WW2, the ME was in the process of decolonization and that meant newly formed Arab nations were trying to figure out their identities; whether it was an religious or ethnic/secular identity. It was in this backdrop that Israel was created and the Zionist began persecuting the Palestinians.

In response to this persecution, voices calling for an identity based on religion (Islam) began to gain in strength and these Arabs demonstrated their beliefs by persecuting the Jewish in their countries. Zionists then used this counter-reaction to argue and implement even more brutal persecution in Israel/Palestine. The pro-religious identity Arabs gained even more strength and continued the cycle.

So Israel started the fire and fanned it, creating the conditions for the mass migration of Jews out of the Arab countries. Why did the Jews never try to migrate out of those Arab countries prior to the creation of Israel? It because conditions never got that bad until the Zionists came into the picture.
This is historical revisionism, the large-scale persecution and ethnic cleansing of Jews in Middle Eastern countries started about a decade prior to the formation of the state of Israel. Moreover, sporadic violence, ethnic cleansing, and state persecution of Jews by Arab states had existed for over a 1000 years prior. This is not new; Israel did not "start the fire" of antisemitic violence in the region. You are essentially blaming an oppressed minority living in these countries for their own plight.

You may also consider consulting the other wikipedia source, and before you retort that this says Mizrahim make up only half of the Jewish population, remember that I stated the population of Jews making up Mizrahi or Sephardi ancestry was 60%. abcd.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ficker22

Senior Member
Registered Member
This is historical revisionism, the large-scale persecution and ethnic cleansing of Jews in Middle Eastern countries started about a decade prior to the formation of the state of Israel. Moreover, sporadic violence, ethnic cleansing, and state persecution of Jews by Arab states had existed for over a 1000 years prior. This is not new; Israel did not "start the fire" of antisemitic violence in the region. You are essentially blaming an oppressed minority living in these countries for their own plight.

You may also consider consulting the other wikipedia source, and before you retort that this says Mizrahim make up only half of the Jewish population, remember that I stated the population of Jews making up Mizrahi or Sephardi ancestry was 60%. View attachment 120757
Nazis are also a oppressed minority in 1933...

You know why the prosecution of jews increased the decade prior israels founding? Because the Britbongs send all the hardcore Ziomists there which caused trouble.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 24525

Guest
Nazis are also a oppressed minority in 1933...
We have discussed all of this at length before, and I know I cannot force you to change your entrenched thought patterns on this conflict any more than you can change mine. I just hope that newer members whose brains are still plastic may read our conversations and draw their own conclusions.

Edit: I did say that Mizrahi alone made up 60% in the comment before last, which contradicted my first reply. That was a mistake, sorry.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ficker22

Senior Member
Registered Member
We have discussed all of this at length before, and I know I cannot force you to change your entrenched thought patterns on this conflict any more than you can change mine. I just hope that newer members whose brains are still plastic may read our conversations and draw their own conclusions.
Not hard, whole world sees that the ruling groups of israel have learned only one thing from the shoah, its application to a modern setting.

Every gentle minded Israeli head of state got assasinated in the past, tells you alot about this society.
 

LaBucz

Just Hatched
Registered Member
This is historical revisionism, the large-scale persecution and ethnic cleansing of Jews in Middle Eastern countries started about a decade prior to the formation of the state of Israel. Moreover, sporadic violence, ethnic cleansing, and state persecution of Jews by Arab states had existed for over a 1000 years prior. This is not new; Israel did not "start the fire" of antisemitic violence in the region. You are essentially blaming an oppressed minority living in these countries for their own plight.

You may also consider consulting the other wikipedia source, and before you retort that this says Mizrahim make up only half of the Jewish population, remember that I stated the population of Jews making up Mizrahi or Sephardi ancestry was 60%. View attachment 120757
The ethnic cleansing of Jews started way before that. You might want to read about Islamic texts of Prophet Muhammad's conquest of Medina where around 700 members of Jewish tribe Banu Qurayza were murdered, women and children put to slavery right after their unconditional surrender.

These were the days of barbarism and should not be used to justify Israel violence against Palestinians.
 

LawLeadsToPeace

Senior Member
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Registered Member
U.N. SECGEN's face says it all:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Just for context, this was a picture taken in October 20th during his visit to Egypt:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
He was there to oversee the humanitarian supplies being sent to Gaza, but there are no indications that he was at the border itself.
 
Last edited:

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
That was a picture taken in October 20th:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I understand that the picture was taken 7 or 9 days ago, since there's no way that Gutierrez would have been allowed to pause the ongoing HANNIBAL DIRECTIVE and MOWING THE LAWN operation being waged against ALL PALESTINIANS, TERRORISTS OR NOT. The essence of the picture and it's message still spoke volume of the man's exasperation and resignation with the very organization he's leading realizing that he's just a puppet, nothing more and nothing less. He can only express an opinion if that opinion is in the mainstream of WESTERN COUNTRIES THAT CONTROL and SEEKS TO CONTROL THE WORLD.
 
Top