If anything, it reveals the toxic state of western values and society; and you see this when an asian elderly person/Asian woman/Asian child is beaten up viciously by an african american, the response from westerners is 'he/she/they must have said the N word'.
China's rise is not supported by Israel because Chinese society doesn't give jewish people a free pass just because they were the victims of genocide last century.
China’s rise is not supported by Israel because Israel is a product of British Imperial policy and is, essentially, an extension of the white-supremacist British Empire. Do I really need to remind anyone of British Imperial policies towards China, even up to 1997 (and, actually, to the present)?
Unfortunately, through the machinations of particular interest groups, the U. S. was deceived, via WWs I and II, into becoming the enforcer of European, and particularly, British Imperialist policies. Hence, the staunchly irrational defense of Israel.
If one looks back to the post-war period, it was Eisenhower, then Kennedy, that tried, to some degree, and in vain, to resist this alignment, particularly with regard to Israel worship. To my understanding, the
Suez Crisis was the last gasp of any chance for a U. S. foreign policy independent of European, and particularly, British Imperial control. The U. S. is
not running the show; the
City Of London is! Israel is the key to the British Empire’s last claim to some divine legitimacy, and the U. S. is the myrmidon tasked with guarding this holy relic!
So, if the Israel problem is to be solved, should we focus on the product, the protector, or the producer? Somehow, I’ve always known to pay
full attention to that man behind the curtain!