Iranian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

27 minutes ago
in case you didn't know
Iran Now Using Advanced Centrifuges, Violating Nuclear Deal
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and now I read
Iran says activates advanced centrifuges to boost enriched uranium
Source: Xinhua| 2019-09-07 15:29:44
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In a fresh move to reduce commitments subject to the 2015 landmark nuclear deal, Iran started up advanced centrifuges on Saturday to boost the country's stockpile of enriched uranium, state TV reported.

The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) activated 20 IR-4 centrifuges and 20 IR-6 centrifuges, the AEOI spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi was quoted as saying.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will continue monitoring the activities of Iran's nuclear program, Kamalvandi said.
 

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
in case you didn't know
Iran Now Using Advanced Centrifuges, Violating Nuclear Deal
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Typical MSM headline grabbing. And at the same time accusing Iran of wrong doing! Good BS food for their intended audience!

But all the time, while accusing Iran of "violating" nuclear deal. It neglect to tell Jo Public that the deal is effectively dead. Killled off unilateraly by Trump!
 

Anlsvrthng

Captain
Registered Member
Capture the narrative.

Paint a background picture that fit your political/carrier need.

The agreement can be violated by Iran only, the USA can not violate anything, because the agreement is not USA law , it was not agreed by the deputy leader of the white house windows cleaners, and the Iranians was stupid to not cross check to this facts before agreed about anything.

But of course if the Iranians willing to adhere the requirements of USA, then they will get in exchange nothing material, only things that not agreed by the secret second secretary of the homeland sewer system maintenance, means agreement not bound the USA anyway :D
 
now
Iran Urges US to 'Put Warmongers Aside' After Bolton Firing
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Iran's president urged the U.S. on Wednesday to "put warmongers aside" as tensions roil the Persian Gulf amid an escalating crisis between Washington and Tehran in the wake of the collapsing nuclear deal with world powers.

Hassan Rouhani's remarks signaled approval of President Donald Trump's
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
as national security adviser, a man routinely pilloried by Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif as part of a "B Team" that targeted Iran.

Bolton had for years been critical of Tehran and once promised before an Iranian exile group that they'd be celebrating the overthrow of Iran's government this year.

Bolton's departure also comes amid speculation about Trump potentially meeting Rouhani during the upcoming U.N. General Assembly this month in New York. Whether such a meeting materializes, however, remains in question, though Iranian comments Wednesday seemed to suggest Tehran would be willing to pin hostilities on the departing Bolton rather than Trump himself.

Rouhani spoke after a Cabinet meeting Wednesday, a day that saw all major newspapers in Iran cover Bolton's departure. The pro-reform Shargh daily newspaper had one large headline that read: "Bolton: A scapegoat for Iran?"

"Americans have to realize that warmongering and warmongers are not to their benefit," the Iranian president said in televised remarks. "They should not only abandon warmongering but also abandon their maximum pressure policy."

Rouhani, in a phone call with French President Emmanuel Macron later Wednesday, repeated his position that if Europe finalizes a way for Iran to sell its oil, Iran would return to the nuclear deal's commitments. He also reiterated that lifting U.S. sanctions would bring Tehran back to the negotiating table with world powers, but the post to his official website detailing the call with Macron did not elaborate on what might be up for negotiation. Rouhani said as long as sanctions remain, "negotiating with the U.S. makes no sense."

Ali Rabiei, a government spokesman, said after the meeting that Bolton's dismissal may help the U.S. have a "less biased" attitude toward Iran.

Though he stressed the dismissal was an internal U.S. issue, Rabiei called Bolton "the symbol of America's hawkish policies and its animosity toward Iran."

For his part, Zarif again used Twitter to write about what he calls the #B_Team, which included Bolton, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, all hawks on Iran.

Zarif said "the world — minus 3 or 2 panicked cohorts — was breathing a sigh of relief" after Bolton's ouster. "Thirst for war — maximum pressure — should go with the warmonger-in-chief," Zarif wrote.

Hard-liners, however, urged caution.

Gen. Mohsen Rezaee, a commander in the powerful Revolutionary Guard and its former chief, said in a tweet: "We will not be deceived by the sacrificing of Bolton."

Ali Shamkhani, a top Iranian security official and secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, said Bolton's exit has "no impact" on how Tehran views U.S. policy. He said what matters to Iran is U.S. "compliance with international commitments as well as lifting cruel and illegal sanctions," the semi-official Fars news agency reported Wednesday.

Bolton was critical of any potential talks between Trump and leaders of Iran and had persuaded Trump to keep U.S. forces in Syria to counter the Iranian influence in the region.

Last year, Trump pulled the U.S. out of the landmark 2015 nuclear deal that lifted sanction on Iran in exchange for caps on Iran's nuclear program. The U.S. administration later also intensified sanctions on Iran, slashing its sales of crude oil abroad and sending the country's economy into freefall.

In response, Iran has in recent months crept past the limits the nuclear deal imposed on uranium enrichment and its uranium stockpile. And over the weekend, Tehran announced it would use advanced centrifuges prohibited under the deal.

Meanwhile, mysterious attacks on oil tankers near the Strait of Hormuz, the downing of a U.S. military surveillance drone by Iran and other incidents across the wider Middle East have exacerbated the crisis in the region as Tehran tries to pressure Europe to find a way to sell crude oil abroad despite U.S. sanctions.

Rouhani has called the use of faster centrifuges Iran's "third step" away from the nuclear deal. On Wednesday, he said that "if necessary, we will take other steps in future."

For his part, Bolton was a longtime hard-liner on Iran who favored regime change and took money for speaking engagements from an Iranian exile group reviled by Tehran called the Mujahedeen-e-Khalq, or MEK. Bolton famously wrote in 2015, before Iran's nuclear deal was struck, an op-ed in The New York Times headlined: "To Stop Iran's Bomb, Bomb Iran."

"The declared policy of the United States of America should be the overthrow of the mullahs' regime in Tehran," Bolton told a cheering crowd of MEK supporters in March 2018. "The behaviors and the objectives of the regime are not going to change, and therefore, the only solution is to change the regime itself. And that's why, before 2019, we here will celebrate in Tehran!"

Bolton would become Trump's third national security adviser a month later.

"I don't back away from any of it. Those are positions I took as a private citizen," Bolton said when journalists asked him during a visit to Abu Dhabi in May about his prior remarks to the MEK. "Right now I'm a government official. I advise the president. I'm the national security adviser, not the national security decision-maker. It's up to him (Trump) to make those decisions."

Trump's decision Tuesday was to fire Bolton. What happens next remains unclear.
 
I share what slightly elevated my blood pressure now:
Analysis 07:58, 16-Sep-2019
Why is the Trump administration biased against Iran?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



I don't run anymore so it's good to increase my blood flow, right? LOL
 

Anlsvrthng

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The central concern, besides the threat the weaponry poses to Saudi Arabia’s strategic infrastructure, is that these drones penetrated a sensitive area, one that is about hundred kilometers from U.S. naval facilities in Bahrain. That means the flight path of the drones or warheads that struck the oil facility could have been within range of air-defense radar based in the Gulf. The United States has a variety of bases in the Middle East, including Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, Al Dhafra Air Base in the UAE, the Fifth Fleet infrastructure in Bahrain, and various sites in Kuwait. The United States deployed F-22 jets to Al Udeid Air Base in June.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that the U.S. Combined Air Operations Center at the Al Udeid Air Base has a “dizzying amount of data and intelligence” flowing from sources such as drones and radar throughout the Middle East. The version of the RQ-4 Global Hawk that was shot down in June near
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
likely based at Al Dhafra Air Base. The USS
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
which is part of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
downed an Iranian drone in July. In a query about the September 14 attack, U.S. CENTCOM responded by referring questions to the Saudi Interior Ministry.


...

The attack shows that drones are able to penetrate deep into
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
of a key U.S. ally and similar attacks will be an increasing concern in the future.
 

Totoro

Major
VIP Professional
On December 2020 the UN arms embargo on arms transfers to Iran will, seemingly end.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


As far as I can tell, from 2015 countries could have still sold Iran arms, provided the UN security council approved it. From 2021 onward that provision will no longer be in effect. So any country could, in theory, decide on its own whether to sell iran conventional arms.

Of course, that's the theory. In practice, what could happen is this:
UN voting to make the embargo last longer, for whatever number of years.

Or, even if the UN can't agree on making the embargo last longer, various countries might twist other countries' arm and prevent them to sell arms to iran. Of course, that's way too hard to predict, if that'd actually work and in to what degree.

So i'll just talk about the (unlikely?) case there will not be any limits to selling Iran arms.

So what could Iran use? Pretty much everything, true. But some things may have priority.

Radars. ELINT systems. Encrypted comms and datalinks. Combat aircraft. Jammers. Recon drones. Cruise missiles. Ballistic missiles. Submarines. SAM systems. Anti air artillery. Torpedos. Anti-ship missiles. ATGMs. Utility helicopters. Combat helicopters. Infantry fighting vehicles. Self propelled artillery. Multiple (guided) rocket launchers. MANPADs. APCs. Tanks. Rifles. Etc.

Priority might go something like that. Of course, that's SO encompassing that it's unlikely even half of stuff from that list would be procured within years in meaningful numbers.

Tech transfer for various systems is something Iran might very well seek, but is unknown if it'd be given.

Since this IS Sino defence forum, where's China in all that? Politically there's reasons both to try to sell and not to sell to Iran. But disregarding politics for a moment - China does have quite a few products it could sell.

Bunch of fairly advanced radar types, covering all uses. J-10CE aircraft with a fairly comprehensive weapons package. B611 missile or more advanced missiles. S26 submarines. HQ9, HQ16 sams. Etc, etc.

Iran does still actively operate some 250 fighter jets (not counting pure strike planes), even though a fair part of those might not be serviceable at any one time.
And pretty much all of those would need replacement. So, a trickle of new planes, as many as the iranian budget might allow, might be possible.

Of all Chinese planes, J-10CE seems to have the best chances, now that we've seen WS10 engine used on domestic variant. FC-1 is still not to be seen with a domestic engine, so selling that might be hard with Russia around. Actually, since China doesn't really have a large plane to offer - Flankers likely not exportable due to licencing agreement with Russia and J20 being too much of a risk to export to anyone - and since Russia doesn't really have a small plane to offer - Mig35 being both closer to middle size and not better than J10C overall, - China and Russia might agree to approach Iran together and each could cover one side of the high-low mix. In theory, upward of 100 planes could be sold by each side. Over a course of a decade, as Iran tries to find money for them.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
The Iranian regime right now is having a quintuplet of whammies of Sanctions, Low oil prices due to the Saudi Russo oil war, Biblical levels of plague in the form of the Corona Virus resulting in quarantine and collapse of the Automotive industry of Iran that served as number 3 of their industry and economy.

If IF they last though this, and can turn around some degree of economic recovery and sanctions were released. They would probably push not for import of fighters directly but push for knock down kits. This is as the Iranians like China have been burned by imports.
 
Top