Iranian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Minm

Junior Member
Registered Member
I agree with your post for the most part but a slight correction: I don‘t advocate for disarming or losing conventional military capabilities of Iran. On the contrary, I think Iran should maintain excellent conventional capabilities. If you read this very own thread, I was advocating for Iran receiving weapons from China. I am, however, against propping up Shia proxies all over the place which I think is the source of majority of conflicts against Iran.
I agree that the proxies can become more of a liability if they're weak, but they're also a deterrent against Israel if they're strong. Propping up Assad was a major foreign policy mistake, because it turned out that he was too weak to survive on his own and an Iran aligned Syria was too close and threatening for Israel to accept. But that's in the past anyway. As for the Palestinian groups, there's a lot of fiction in the media. Hamas doesn't get weapons deliveries from Iran. Iran didn't order the operation against Israel in 2023 . They should certainly stop the rhetoric about Palestine that makes people think that Iran is a major supporter of Hamas.

Supporting Hezbollah and Yemen is cheap, makes an Israeli attack more costly and moves the first phase of conflict away from Iranian soil. Will cutting off Hezbollah and the Houthis make Iran safer or less safe? Preemptively disarming the Houthis is not going to help anyone.

Other than the historical support for Syria and the Iraqi and Afghan insurgency, I don't see the proxy groups as a source of conflict between Israel or the West or the Arabs and Iran. Hezbollah and the Houthis are not a source of conflict but increase the little deterrence that Iran has against the west. Would Iran not have been attacked if it hadn't given weapons to the Houthis or Hezbollah?

Publicly criticising Israel and speaking up for the Palestinians is probably a bigger mistake. But ahmadinejad is long gone and the current government is speaking in a very mild tone. That won't stop western media from repeating the "wipe off the map" quote
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
There are very few years of demographic dividends left for Iran. If they don‘t take advantage of it, then it‘s sayonara forever. A rational government would put the entire conflict in the ME in the closet for at least a few decades before the country reaches a certain level of development.
China has nukes. Iran does not.
It is because of the nukes that China could reduce military spending.
 

Soldier30

Captain
Registered Member
Iran unveiled its latest jet-powered reconnaissance and attack drone, the Shahed-161. The drone's primary purpose is reconnaissance and surveillance, and it can also be used for border patrol. The drone is believed to be a reverse-engineered version of the American RQ-170 Sentinel, with the Iranian version being 40% smaller. It can also carry two bombs weighing up to 50 kilograms. If the drone proves successful, it could be produced in Russia as well. The Shahed-161, weighing 170 kg, has a range of 150-300 km and can remain airborne for approximately 2-3 hours. It can fly at an altitude of up to 9,000 meters and a cruising speed of approximately 135 km/h.

 
Top