Infantry Combat Equipment (non-firearm): Vests, Body Armor, NVGs, etc.

LawLeadsToPeace

Senior Member
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Registered Member
I don't get why this isn't already distributed to elite units. Clearly it isn't an issue of money already, the gear is literally there. It just needs to be given to the elite units that will make better use of it.
Another possibility is that the guy in picture is just wearing airsoft gear for a demo given the fact that he is a student.
 

Papppi

New Member
Registered Member
Another possibility is that the guy in picture is just wearing airsoft gear for a demo given the fact that he is a student.
Well, "student" of the most prestigious "university" (military academy) directly ran and affiliated with the Central Military Commission, in charge of training future high ranking PLA officers and engineers forming the backbone of the fighting force. The NUDT (in US terms) is essentially a mix of MIT and West Point, not exactly a normal university. And considering RnD in the institution consumes millions in funds on a monthly basis, I doubt they would be saving on a few pieces of infantry gear, simply not worth it
 

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Well, "student" of the most prestigious "university" (military academy) directly ran and affiliated with the Central Military Commission, in charge of training future high ranking PLA officers and engineers forming the backbone of the fighting force. The NUDT (in US terms) is essentially a mix of MIT and West Point, not exactly a normal university. And considering RnD in the institution consumes millions in funds on a monthly basis, I doubt they would be saving on a few pieces of infantry gear, simply not worth it
PLAAF is still using CJ-6, a piston trainer that first flew in 1958. PLA is a cheapskate.
 

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
And pretty much every branch of the US military still uses the Beechcraft T-34 trainer, which first flew in the 1940s, are they also cheapskates? Not exactly a fair comparison
From wikipedia:

After a production hiatus of almost 15 years, the T-34C Turbo-Mentor powered by a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
A-25 turboprop engine was developed in 1973.
The T-34C is no longer used as a primary training aircraft for
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Student Naval Aviators and various
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
/Allied/Coalition student pilots training under U.S. Navy auspices. It has been replaced by the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
at NAS Corpus Christi's Training Air Wing FOUR recently retired the T-34C as a Naval Primary Training Aircraft according to Chief of Naval Aviation Training (CNATRA) PAO, joining Training Air Wing SIX at
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, Training Air Wing FIVE at
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and Training Air Wing FOUR's Training Squadron TWENTY-SEVEN at
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
had already transitioned to the T-6A and T-6B models.
USAF is nowhere as cheap as the PLAAF.

China hasn't fought any wars in the last 30 or so years and is not expecting much heavy ground fighting in the future, therefore infantry equipment are not exactly priority items.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
the PLA soldiers wear their NVG on the dominant side, it shows that they are not very familiar with how to use their NVGs. eventually they will learn that monocular NVGs are supposed to be worn on your weak side.

There is no such convention. It’s down to personal preference and equipment setup.

For what they have got - digital NVGs for navigation and long range thermal weapons sights, having the NODs on their dominant eye makes perfect sense since they will only be using the NODs to get into position, and would be using their thermal scopes for target ID and shooting. Using one eye for both means they retain their natural night vision in their non-dominant eye.

With thermal weapons sights like that, you are not going to be doing snapshots so the second or two you loose flipping your NODs up is irrelevant. If they wanted to round off their setup, they can add an IR aiming laser to allow them to do active aiming if there is a good chance they might run into hostiles unexpectedly at close range. But since they are boarder guards in open country, that chance is small enough as can be safely discounted for standard issue equipment.
 

by78

General
New vests and body armor for UN peace keepers, who had been previously issued the Type-15 system (2nd image). Note the new neck and upper-arm armor as well as the quick-release shoulder straps.

53411247996_8bf729e6ce_k.jpg

51745891815_45921740fb_k.jpg
 
Top